Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Receiving\s+loop\s+comparison\:\s+Pixel\s+vs\s+20\s+ft\s+and\s+40\s+ft\s+passive\s+loops\s+$long$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Receiving\s+loop\s+comparison\:\s+Pixel\s+vs\s+20\s+ft\s+and\s+40\s+ft\s+passive\s+loops\s+$long$\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Receiving loop comparison: Pixel vs 20 ft and 40 ft passive loops (long) (score: 1): Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2013 12:52:55 -0800; For the second night of the ARRL contest, I set up three receiving loops with a switch to compare them in real time. A Pixel circular loop (10 foot perimeter) using the 30 dB Clifton Labs preamp that; /archives//html/Topband/2013-12/msg00088.html (10,343 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]