Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Received\s+Frequency\s+Response\s+of\s+Half\s+Wave\s+Dipole\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Received\s+Frequency\s+Response\s+of\s+Half\s+Wave\s+Dipole\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Received Frequency Response of Half Wave Dipole (score: 1): Author: "Roger Kennedy" <roger@wessexproductions.co.uk>; Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2023 10:25:29 -0500; I currently have OFCOM investigating a local noise interference source. It's just a wideband hash across all bands, but worse on 160m (my main band). When looking on their Spectrum Analyser plugged i; /archives//html/Topband/2023-02/msg00000.html (6,743 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Received Frequency Response of Half Wave Dipole (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 10:58:51 -0800; It's unlikely that the SWR bandwidth of your antenna was contributing significant loss on receive over the 160M band. 73, Jim K9YC _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_to; /archives//html/Topband/2023-02/msg00002.html (7,458 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]