I think you have a syntax problem in that sentence, but I recognize the formula. You said further: I think you have that right. Sounds correct to me, but what's your point? If you are alluding to mea
Author: doconnor at chartermi.net (Dennis O'Connor)
Date: Sat May 17 08:56:51 2003
Barry, Given your premise that the observed current taper equals radiation, and assuming that 1500 watts into the average antenna coil neither melts it, nor radiates light, then it must be radiated a
The other interesting thing to consider is why a center loaded antenna exhibits a current taper across the inductor whereas the inductor in a base loaded antenna would not (I am assuming here that th
your premise is that the EM field contained in an inductor is not as conserved as previously thought, then a parallel tuned circuit, minus the radiating whip, should result in radiation consistent wi
In response to Mike, Bruce, and others: There seems to be a trend towards forgetting the physical dimensions of the loading scheme in question. I'd like to caution those trying to wrap their mind aro
To: Dennis O'Connor, Michael Tope, et al, Mike?s message: The other interesting thing to consider is why a center loaded antenna exhibits a current taper across the inductor whereas the inductor in a
about PVC Hi Larry and all, No matter hat the shape of the coil or what the mutual coupling from end-to-end, the only way current can taper is if current has a second path to ground other than the o