Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+RF\s+choke\s+woes\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+RF\s+choke\s+woes\?\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: RF choke woes?? (score: 1): Author: Jimmy Burrell <jimmy@burrellshome.com>; Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 11:47:57 -0500; Just built a wire vertical dipole (Lazy H style) yesterday for 80m (very similar to the one shown on EI7BA's web site here ). Since I am feeding the antenna asymeterically I knew an RF Choke would be; /archives//html/Topband/2007-05/msg00031.html (6,966 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: RF choke woes?? (score: 1): Author: John Tait <bravo@iol.ie>; Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 12:08:08 +0100; Hi Jimmy.. On my 80m H, I use an FT240-61 with 12 turns of RG-58 right at the feedpoint. I also use another choke similar to yours, about 8ft below the feedpoint, where it's weight can be supported o; /archives//html/Topband/2007-05/msg00035.html (8,817 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: RF choke woes?? (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 08:43:40 -0400; Baluns and chokes are a big complex issue. The problem is the uncontrolled environment. A feedline exiting a HV point or paralleling an antenna conductor is a worse case situation. To test for sensi; /archives//html/Topband/2007-05/msg00037.html (10,688 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]