- 1. Topband: Quarter wavelength stub as trap (score: 1)
- Author: "ik2bcp - Guido Tedeschi" <guido.ted@tin.it>
- Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 01:08:10 +0200
- Good night from Italy. What do you think about using a quarter wavelength shorted stub, made with coaxial cable, as trap for an 80m + 160m inverted L? 15.6m of RG213, shorted at one end, will block 8
- /archives//html/Topband/2005-04/msg00094.html (7,615 bytes)
- 2. Topband: Quarter wavelength stub as trap (score: 1)
- Author: "DAVID CUTHBERT" <DAVIDNNAN@MSN.COM>
- Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:44:25 -0600
- Good night from Italy. What do you think about using a quarter wavelength shorted stub, made with coaxial cable, as trap for an 80m + 160m inverted L? 15.6m of RG213, shorted at one end, will block 8
- /archives//html/Topband/2005-04/msg00095.html (6,878 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: Quarter wavelength stub as trap (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 21:16:08 -0400
- stub, made with It is terrible. On 80 meters it looks like a 3000 ohm resistor. On 160 meters it looks like a 50 ohm inductance with a Q of only 25, which is 2 ohms loss resistance. will represent a
- /archives//html/Topband/2005-04/msg00096.html (8,736 bytes)
- 4. Re: Topband: Quarter wavelength stub as trap (score: 1)
- Author: "ik2bcp - Guido Tedeschi" <guido.ted@tin.it>
- Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 11:52:31 +0200
- Thanks a lot to all for the very quick answers! It is clear that the stub is a very bad trap and can be useful only for some filtering... I visited Tom's website and I read his very insteresting arti
- /archives//html/Topband/2005-04/msg00097.html (7,544 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu