- 1. Topband: Polarized current and interference (score: 1)
- Author: Hermod Pedersen <hermod.pedersen@bolina.hsb.se>
- Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 21:10:11 +0200
- In a web story run by the Cleveland Plain Dealer has an interesting/dubious part on AC polarization and its part in radio interference. It says: "If you are using a nonbattery radio, make sure that t
- /archives//html/Topband/2004-08/msg00122.html (7,131 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: Polarized current and interference (score: 1)
- Author: David Sinclair <k3ky@erols.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 19:11:40 -0400
- Hermod Pedersen wrote: In a web story run by the Cleveland Plain Dealer has an interesting/dubious part on AC polarization and its part in radio interference. It says: "If you are using a nonbattery
- /archives//html/Topband/2004-08/msg00123.html (8,533 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: Polarized current and interference (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:09:57 -0400
- electrical it still fits, [http://www.cleveland.com/living/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base /living/109351285615492.xml] posing as an intermixed in the sources They must filters. I think he lifted that f
- /archives//html/Topband/2004-08/msg00124.html (9,142 bytes)
- 4. Re: Topband: Polarized current and interference (score: 1)
- Author: David Sinclair <k3ky@erols.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:28:17 -0400
- wa4dou@juno.com wrote: Tom, I think we can forgive civilians for not knowing they're not experts in radio. Lots of hams make the same mistake. 73 de Roy WA4DOU Ouch! Touche! I quite foolishly assumed
- /archives//html/Topband/2004-08/msg00127.html (9,299 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu