Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Patience\s+in\s+ARRL\s+160\s+Contest\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: Patience in ARRL 160 Contest (score: 1)
Author: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 07:54:17 -0400
I worked a whole bunch of Europeans in the 160 meter contest along with UA9's and even 4Z1UF who had a good signal. My pet peeve is that when I hear only a weaker stations prefix but miss the suffix
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00114.html (14,519 bytes)

22. Re: Topband: Patience in ARRL 160 Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 12:30:35 +0000
I think it depends on how much you think you "own" the run frequency. If you really feel you own it worldwide, no need to send your call as part of the exchange while running. Or his call after its b
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00116.html (11,393 bytes)

23. Re: Topband: Patience in ARRL 160 Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 07:51:34 -0600
When a cw station asks for a fill I send my COMPLETE callsign. Why? a) My memory keyer or logging program has my full callsign, no partial callsign. I don't use the hand keyer just in case I have 'de
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00120.html (11,340 bytes)

24. Re: Topband: Patience in ARRL 160 Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Augie \"Gus\" Hansen" <augie.hansen@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 08:02:35 -0700
Hi Jim, as in "CQ TEST KB0YH", with about a 1-2 second loop delay. I have NEVER found a CQ repeat interfal less than 2.5 seconds to be adequate to actually LISTEN for callers, and I often use 3 secon
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00122.html (10,805 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 24
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu