Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+New\s+guy\s+here\.\s+Low\s+noise\s+rx\s+antenna\s+for\s+1\/2\s+acre\s+lot\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: New guy here. Low noise rx antenna for 1/2 acre lot? (score: 1)
Author: steve d <kc8qvo@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 20:10:51 -0800 (PST)
Hi, I just joined this forum because I am interested in Top Band. I figured I can learn more from you guys than the HFPack yahoo group HIHI (there are very knowlegeable people on there, but this foru
/archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00029.html (8,141 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: New guy here. Low noise rx antenna for 1/2 acre lot? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 08:22:40 -0500
luckey I can catch some noise levels that dont register on the S meter. These readings are with the preamp on the rig turned off. I dont really care what the strength of the signals are with the ante
/archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00031.html (8,888 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: New guy here. Low noise rx antenna for 1/2 acre lot? (score: 1)
Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 09:51:33 -0500
" I have noticed that my G5RV picks up about HALF the noise that the K9AY loops do, and when I try to use my pre-amp (ICE, 1800-2000kHz) with the loops all it does is amplify the noise. The signal/no
/archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00036.html (9,003 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: New guy here. Low noise rx antenna for 1/2 acre lot? (score: 1)
Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 12:32:27 -0600
I dont really care what the strength of the signals are with the antenna or its directivity - I just want a QUIETER antenna! I can use the preamp to bring the level back up. I would prefer something
/archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00041.html (8,598 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: New guy here. Low noise rx antenna for 1/2 acre lot? (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 11:25:28 -0800 (PST)
Generally true, but on the other hand, I frequently can hear as well or almost as well on 160m using a 40m inverted vee (basically omnidirectional) compared to a VERY directional Beverage. I am assum
/archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00043.html (8,821 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: New guy here. Low noise rx antenna for 1/2 acre lot? (score: 1)
Author: W2pm@aol.com
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 14:46:52 EST
I already sent a reply to Steve that this situation sounds odd, however. His transmitting antenna should definity have TONS more noise in that environment than the AY loop whether it's vertical or ho
/archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00044.html (8,079 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: New guy here. Low noise rx antenna for 1/2 acre lot? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 19:26:43 -0500
odd, however. His in that horizontal... If you mean less noise power delivered to the receiver, I'll agree. That's because a small antenna is less sensitive to both signals and noise. It hears less
/archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00057.html (9,087 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: New guy here. Low noise rx antenna for 1/2 acre lot? (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 18:20:46 -0800
Looks like Ohio State (W8LT) still has a pretty good ham club: http://arc.org.ohio-state.edu/index.php They list 80-10 coverage for their HF equipment, but it looks like the same stuff we had back in
/archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00061.html (12,564 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu