Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Looking\s+back\s+11\s+years\s+ago\s+on\s+160\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Looking back 11 years ago on 160 (score: 1)
Author: Mark Lunday <wd4elg@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 01:04:49 +0000
The band was on fire from here in central NC. Logbook shows lots of EU, C5, KH6, 5T, PY0S, RI1ANF, V5, ZS, ZL, even UY0ZG! Something is different, maybe it's not just me. Mark Lunday, WD4ELG Greensbo
/archives//html/Topband/2023-11/msg00008.html (7,000 bytes)

2. Topband: Looking back 11 years ago on 160 (score: 1)
Author: "Roger Kennedy" <roger@wessexproductions.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2023 18:25:06 -0500
Well when I complain on here that DX Propagation on 160m isn't nearly as good as it was years ago, people say things like "it's the Sunspot Cycle . . ." Mark, clearly you agree that it's not that sim
/archives//html/Topband/2023-11/msg00012.html (6,439 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Looking back 11 years ago on 160 (score: 1)
Author: <n4is@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 20:09:04 -0400
Fellow top-banders Propagation on 160m is always good. The MUF is always well above 1.8 MHz, so the signal always get into your antenna. The key on 160 is how low is your noise! The attenuation is th
/archives//html/Topband/2023-11/msg00013.html (7,391 bytes)

4. Topband: Looking back 11 years ago on 160 (score: 1)
Author: "Roger Kennedy" <roger@wessexproductions.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2023 07:39:51 -0500
I know what you're saying JC . . . we should make the best of things as they are NOW . . . But my talking about signals being stronger on Top Band years ago is not "rose tinted spectacles" . . . I'm
/archives//html/Topband/2023-11/msg00017.html (7,438 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu