Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Inverted\s+\"L\"\s+vs\.\"\s+T\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Inverted\s+\"L\"\s+vs\.\"\s+T\"\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Inverted "L" vs." T" (score: 1): Author: RK <midnight18@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 03:42:07 +0000; Hello Gary, Regarding your question: "Is there any advantage in using an Inverted-L if you have to run it up a tree where the vertical run is very close to the tree verses a "T" where the vertical po; /archives//html/Topband/2008-10/msg00041.html (7,974 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Inverted "L" vs." T" (score: 1): Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 10:02:58 -0400; The effect of trees is very murky and poorly researched (for cause). They certainly do not respond in the same manner as metal conductors. Some where in the archives of this or the TowerTalk reflect; /archives//html/Topband/2008-10/msg00042.html (9,368 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Inverted "L" vs." T" (score: 1): Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>; Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 11:19:41 -0500; W7RH wrote: Further with the T portion as top loading the feed point radiation resistance will be greater for a given vertical height. This when coupled with an excellent ground system of 1/4 wave ra; /archives//html/Topband/2008-10/msg00043.html (8,515 bytes)
4. Topband: Inverted "L" vs." T" (score: 1): Author: Dennis OConnor <ad4hk2004@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 11:44:15 -0700 (PDT); The effect of trees on 160 signals is going to be minor in either case... The conductive salts and sugars in the sap are mostly confined to a thin skin around the trunk and more heavily in the leaves; /archives//html/Topband/2008-10/msg00062.html (7,892 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: Inverted "L" vs." T" (score: 1): Author: "Herbert Schoenbohm" <herbs@vitelcom.net>; Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:18:47 -0400; "For various reasons I have come to favor elevated radials for 160... In fact, my current 160 antenna has a single quarter wave, elevated radial under the vertical... The antenna works." Great data D; /archives//html/Topband/2008-10/msg00100.html (7,994 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]