Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Fwd\:\s+Re\:\s+BOGs\,\s+Snakes\s+and\s+snowpack\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Fwd\:\s+Re\:\s+BOGs\,\s+Snakes\s+and\s+snowpack\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Fwd: Re: BOGs, Snakes and snowpack (score: 1): Author: "K1FZ-Bruce" <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 07:12:44 -0500; I can believe this. If you think of earth as also capacitance to the wire, the optimum frequency would go much lower. Using radial wire grounds instead of deep ground rods, become part of the probl; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00710.html (7,879 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Fwd: Re: BOGs, Snakes and snowpack (score: 1): Author: K2RS <K2RSonline@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 20:47:31 -0500; Thanks to everyone who offered info about the effectiveness of on-the-ground receive antennas operating under a snowpack. 73, Jack K2RS I can believe this. If you think of earth as also capacitance t; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00757.html (7,392 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]