- 1. Topband: CQWW and 160 (score: 1)
- Author: Ron Spencer via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
- Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2020 12:27:15 -0500
- Here too in central NC conditions were, at best, poor. Bad prop and lots of QRN. However did manage to work 38 countries. And had a reasonable run last hour of contest. However, checking the stats,
- /archives//html/Topband/2020-12/msg00009.html (7,502 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: CQWW and 160 (score: 1)
- Author: Artek Manuals <Manuals@ArtekManuals.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 13:35:33 -0500
- Ron Count me in , I agree no same country contacts, PERIOD AND.... you wouldn't loose any zones ..zones 3, 4 and 5 are covered in Canada as well! Dave NR1DX However, checking the stats, almost 1/3 of
- /archives//html/Topband/2020-12/msg00017.html (8,629 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: CQWW and 160 (score: 1)
- Author: w5zn@w5zn.org
- Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2020 12:53:17 -0600
- I don't believe this would significantly reduce the number of USA to USA callers. In reviewing the large number I had, on all bands not just 160, the USA callers were simply calling for a "general" Q
- /archives//html/Topband/2020-12/msg00018.html (9,040 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu