Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Beverages\s+and\s+VK\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Beverages\s+and\s+VK\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Beverages and VK (score: 1): Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:08:30 -0400; Lately when I worked a VK on 160m, the transmit antenna antenna heard better than beverages. In other cases with the VKs, the beverages were better but not by much. I am wondering why this is the cas; /archives//html/Topband/2020-09/msg00044.html (7,036 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Beverages and VK (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 08:46:32 -0700; I am sure you will get lots of input on this - but my experience makes me think that this is due to the angle the signals are coming in from. I often think openings near my sunrise have a higher angl; /archives//html/Topband/2020-09/msg00045.html (7,568 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Beverages and VK (score: 1): Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 09:09:17 -0700; antenna. At a previous QTH - I would sometimes find a low dipole buried in a small ravine was my best RX antenna. Another indicator that a high angle was a play. Tree N6TR Observed same thing here w; /archives//html/Topband/2020-09/msg00046.html (7,723 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Beverages and VK (score: 1): Author: <dj7ww@t-online.de>; Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:40:00 +0200; At my place the two beverages I am using, 160m to NW, 120m to NE are only good for decent signals. The real weak ones I can only copy with my vertical which is an elevated GP (top loaded tower) fed a; /archives//html/Topband/2020-09/msg00050.html (8,084 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: Beverages and VK (score: 1): Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 15:18:22 -0400; Interesting observations with dipoles and high angle of arrival at sunrise/sunset. But from graphs, the beverage also has a fairly high radiation angle. I am wondering whether anybody has compared be; /archives//html/Topband/2020-09/msg00051.html (7,057 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: Beverages and VK (score: 1): Author: K9FD <merv.k9fd@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:19:12 -1000; Did you try all the other direction beverages you have? In the past 20 years of operating here in KH6 I find many times EU comes through over central america, not over USA, and its hard as heck to te; /archives//html/Topband/2020-09/msg00053.html (8,738 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: Beverages and VK (score: 1): Author: Paolo Zaffi <i4ewh1@tin.it>; Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 23:15:07 +0200; Il 16/09/2020 21:18, Ignacy Misztal ha scritto: I am wondering whether anybody has compared beverages on 80m with RX vertical arrays or transmit 4 sq. On 80m, my Beverages are a bit better than 4 sq; /archives//html/Topband/2020-09/msg00054.html (8,134 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: Beverages and VK (score: 1): Author: VE6WZ Steve <ve6wz@shaw.ca>; Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 15:57:36 -0600 (MDT); Merv, I couldnt agree more. As Merv says....Its hard as heck to get EU to listen on the skew path. Last year when the AU was fairly quiet, the direct EU polar path prevailed, but in years past, the s; /archives//html/Topband/2020-09/msg00055.html (10,137 bytes)
9. Topband: Beverages and VK (score: 1): Author: Dennis OConnor via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 19:19:48 +0000 (UTC); If that beverage allows you to hear and work just one extra contact in a contest and that is a multiplier you just worked hundreds of stations. Seems worthwhile to me. denny / k8do _________________; /archives//html/Topband/2020-09/msg00066.html (7,696 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]