Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+2Wire\,\s+Inc\.\s+3800HGV\-B\s+Gateway\.\s+RFI\s+\-\-Problem\s+fixed\s+for\s+now\.\.\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: 2Wire, Inc. 3800HGV-B Gateway. RFI --Problem fixed for now.. (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 11:13:22 -0500
Im running 250' of shielded CAT5 from house to equipment trailer where the router resides and then another 120' up the tower to the 5.8GHz link. Its bundled with the hardline feedlines, rotor and rel
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00042.html (9,896 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: 2Wire, Inc. 3800HGV-B Gateway. RFI --Problem fixed for now.. (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <jeff@ac0c.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 12:16:49 -0600
The fundamental problem with this 2wire box (and the uVerse system and similar types) is that it uses the entire low HF spectrum for transmission. The system is - by design - a receiver across the 16
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00043.html (11,374 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: 2Wire, Inc. 3800HGV-B Gateway. RFI --Problem fixed for now.. (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2012 10:38:58 -0800
The issues, Carl, are not with CAT5, shielded or unshielded, but rather with the equipment on either end, which can generate RF trash or be susceptible to RF trash. Some commonly used Ethernet produc
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00045.html (8,982 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: 2Wire, Inc. 3800HGV-B Gateway. RFI --Problem fixed for now.. (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 18:05:30 -0500
The problems with the 2-Wire corp's 3800 are that even WITH the degree of suppression afforded by twisted pair, if a 1.5 kW 160/80/40 signal (which is IN BAND to the 3800) is around, that the depth o
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00047.html (12,531 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: 2Wire, Inc. 3800HGV-B Gateway. RFI --Problem fixed for now.. (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 14:14:42 -0500
Im well aware of that but the only noise generator in that system was the router switching PS and I replaced that with a linear one. Over the years Ive spent days or weeks eliminating noise sources g
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00052.html (10,655 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu