- 1. Topband: 160 SSB by DXpeditions (score: 1)
- Author: N7DF <n7df@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:15:08 -0800 (PST)
- It would be nice if more DXpeditions would schedule some 160 SSB Several recent operations have simply ruled it out entirely Admittedly there is not a potential for lots of QSOs but some of us would
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00149.html (7,345 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: 160 SSB by DXpeditions (score: 1)
- Author: wb6rse1@mac.com
- Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:37:49 -0800
- It would be nice if more DXpeditions would schedule some 160 SSB ______ I could not disagree more. CW is THE mode that will produce the greatest number of Qs & new ones on 160 - assuming that is in f
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00153.html (7,052 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: 160 SSB by DXpeditions (score: 1)
- Author: "Cliff Frescura" <cf@cfcorp.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 20:07:24 -0800
- The VP6DX operation (N5IA) was going like gangbusters during the CQ 160 SSB contest Here's the full story http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/3830/2008-March/152466.html Granted, most of their Q's
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00157.html (7,914 bytes)
- 4. Re: Topband: 160 SSB by DXpeditions (score: 1)
- Author: Chris G3SVL <Chris@G3SVL.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 08:42:36 +0000
- When we were on the 3B7C DX-pedition we had a lot of requests for SSB on 160m - and those request grew with time. So we announced a system of going to SSB at the top of every (propagation) hour and c
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00160.html (7,687 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu