Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+1\/2\s+wave\s+tower\.\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+1\/2\s+wave\s+tower\.\.\.\.\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 1/2 wave tower.... (score: 1): Author: Brian Gieryk <ke6iyc@mac.com>; Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 07:57:02 -0700; Here goes more insanity...... With the possibility of 380' of tower sitting in front of me, the question arises, 2 1/4 waves in phase, or 1 1/2 wave? Thoughts? Brian KE6IYC __________________________; /archives//html/Topband/2009-04/msg00002.html (6,289 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: 1/2 wave tower.... (score: 1): Author: wa5pok@peoplepc.com; Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 14:56:45 -0500; Well Now ... Phased lazy Vs come to mind. The quickest and easiest would be to hang a delta loop off that thing, easy to tune, broadband, no radials to mess with, and about a db or so gain. 73 es Ha; /archives//html/Topband/2009-04/msg00003.html (7,286 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: 1/2 wave tower.... (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 13:08:40 -0700; According to my arithmetic, 380 ft would be something on the order of 0.7 wavelength on 160M, depending on the cross section of the tower. Shouldn't be too tough to load. It's favored vertical angle; /archives//html/Topband/2009-04/msg00004.html (7,319 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: 1/2 wave tower.... (score: 1): Author: Sam Morgan <ka5oai@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 15:54:15 -0500; lets get wild here... 2 ele delta loop point at top and horizontally fed in middle of bottom of side (base) of triangle with radiation direction electronically reversible (maybe around 132 feet from; /archives//html/Topband/2009-04/msg00009.html (8,107 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]