Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+elevated\s+radials\s+versus\s+ground\s+mounted\s+radials\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+elevated\s+radials\s+versus\s+ground\s+mounted\s+radials\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: elevated radials versus ground mounted radials (score: 1): Author: sire@omen.com.au (Steve Ireland); Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 06:33:33 +0800; Dear Eric (and Carl), I really enjoyed your piece - it was the most enlightening piece I have read about ground systems in my entire time on this reflector. Phil K5PC's response was similarly thought; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00253.html (8,132 bytes)
2. TopBand: elevated radials versus ground mounted radials (score: 1): Author: btippett@CTC.Net (Bill Tippett); Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 19:08:01 -0500; Gentlemen: No one will be forced to take discussions of 160 meter content off this reflector as long as they are carried on in a civil manner, without personal insults, taunts and innuendos. I have Z; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00255.html (7,994 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]