Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+W4YV\s+\&\s+SP5EWY\s+\-\s+Half\s+Slopers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+W4YV\s+\&\s+SP5EWY\s+\-\s+Half\s+Slopers\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: W4YV & SP5EWY - Half Slopers (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham); Date: Tue, 03 Feb 1998 03:53:44 EST; Re: SP5EWY's posting on this reflector about half-slopers. I'm no expert on them, having only used one on 80m for a year. It was a very effective antenna, but it totally messed up my 160m shunt feed; /archives//html/Topband/1998-02/msg00023.html (8,575 bytes)
2. TopBand: W4YV & SP5EWY - Half Slopers (score: 1): Author: rtym@ippt.gov.pl (Ryszard Tymkiewicz); Date: Tue, 03 Feb 1998 10:33:13 +0100; Well,I had previously my Tower without radials and Sloper favored South /sloping wire in this direction/ by at least 1S. Two years ago I digged about 20 radials and since then it seems to radiate eq; /archives//html/Topband/1998-02/msg00024.html (7,811 bytes)
3. TopBand: W4YV & SP5EWY - Half Slopers (score: 1): Author: prforbes@tbsa.com.au (Peter Forbes); Date: Tue, 3 Feb 1998 21:25:46 +1100; Dear Readers, I have a similar setup to that of SP5EWY, but minus the extra 30mx piece of wire. The tower is 16mx high with a A3WS and a 204BA on top (plus a 146mhz collinear vertical). I run three 1; /archives//html/Topband/1998-02/msg00025.html (10,465 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]