- 1. TopBand: Re: N4KG 160 system ? (score: 1)
- Author: n4kg@juno.com (T. A. Russell)
- Date: Sun, 02 Feb 1997 08:13:10 EST
- Hi Steve - With only 4 radials, I expect that a few more would improve efficiency and reduce the feedpoint impedance. NN4T/WA4CTA and I both observed a reduction in impedance as radials were added fr
- /archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00021.html (9,946 bytes)
- 2. TopBand: Re: N4KG 160 system ? (score: 1)
- Author: w77kxb@juno.com (William Harris)
- Date: Sun, 02 Feb 1997 09:35:19 EST
- Good morning Tom: FYI, there is an interesting article in the arrl ANTENNA COMPENDIUM, Vol 2, Pg 42: "A Multiband Loaded Counterpoise for Vertical Antennas." The author, H. L. Ley, N3CDR also gave re
- /archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00023.html (7,339 bytes)
- 3. TopBand: Re: N4KG 160 system ? (score: 1)
- Author: W8JITom@aol.com (W8JITom@aol.com)
- Date: Sun, 2 Feb 1997 12:59:03 -0500 (EST)
- Hi Bill, First a point of humor. I fully expect in a few years the real truth will come out. No radials are better than 120 radials, and the less radials we use the better our signals will be. The sh
- /archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00028.html (8,163 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu