Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Propagation\s+Beacons\s+on\s+160\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Propagation\s+Beacons\s+on\s+160\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: Propagation Beacons on 160 (score: 1): Author: hwardsil@WOLFENET.com (Ward Silver); Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 11:53:50 -0800 (PST); Here's an interesting short-term experiment. N6TR (and others) have wondered about how different propagation is between the 1.8-1.85MHz subband where most DX is worked and at 1.95-2.0MHz where nothi; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00309.html (8,094 bytes)
2. TopBand: Propagation Beacons on 160 (score: 1): Author: price.smith@worldnet.att.net (Harold Smith); Date: Fri, 20 Mar 1998 15:10:13 +0000; Hello Ward: I am replying to your message. I would believe that there would on many occasions have different propagation between 1.830 and 1.9 or 2.0 mHz. This question was brought up before Merv's K; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00333.html (7,210 bytes)
3. TopBand: Propagation Beacons on 160 (score: 1): Author: mikedev@interalpha.co.uk (Mike Devereux - G3SED); Date: Fri, 20 Mar 1998 14:07:18 +0000; I'd be happy to QSY with any DX station to the upper part of 160 Mtrs as an experiment to compare signals. I can remote tune my shunt fed tower in a few seconds. If you want to try - just ask me next; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00339.html (7,571 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]