Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Elevation\s+Angle\s+of\s+Maximum\s+Radiation\s+from\s+Verticals\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: Elevation Angle of Maximum Radiation from Verticals (score: 1)
Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham)
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 00:05:12 EDT
Hi, Top-Banders: After I posted a message comparing gains and radiation angles of various-size verticals, I received a message from John, ON4UN, pointing out that the radiation angle is largely affec
/archives//html/Topband/1997-07/msg00119.html (10,658 bytes)

2. TopBand: Elevation Angle of Maximum Radiation from Verticals (score: 1)
Author: eldridge@whistler.net (Bob Eldridge)
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 06:46:32 -0700 (PDT)
degrees. I think that last comment is VERY relevant. I would go out on a limb and say that I think that with monopoles the upper part of the lobe does most of the work on 160, and that the antennas
/archives//html/Topband/1997-07/msg00125.html (7,921 bytes)

3. TopBand: Elevation Angle of Maximum Radiation from Verticals (score: 1)
Author: w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net)
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 10:48:36 +0000
Hi Earl, Good to hear you again! I was thinking of the early W5RTQ articles about shunt feeding towers when the topic came up. To: <topband@contesting.com> Be careful using NEC based programs to dete
/archives//html/Topband/1997-07/msg00127.html (10,768 bytes)

4. TopBand: Elevation Angle of Maximum Radiation from Verticals (score: 1)
Author: w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net)
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 12:08:32 +0000
To: <topband@contesting.com> You should be surprised Bob. A vertical antenna's radiation angle is affected very little by a near field radial system. The only exception would be if the radials were a
/archives//html/Topband/1997-07/msg00133.html (8,420 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu