Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+EWEs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+EWEs\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: EWEs (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm); Date: Wed, 1 Apr 1998 06:05:58 EST; Can anyone explain whether a "Beverage" on 1.8 mhz is really a classic, textbook Beverage or just a low longwire? The reason why I ask is this issue of poor ground vs good ground relative to apparent; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00001.html (7,853 bytes)
2. TopBand: EWEs (score: 1): Author: btippett@CTC.Net (Bill Tippett); Date: Wed, 01 Apr 1998 06:58:12 -0500; has been hearing EXTREMELY well the past few weeks! 73, Bill W4ZV "Just got off the topband reflector. Interesting on the EWE write up. The first quote is actually mine ! I agree with most that is s; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00003.html (9,288 bytes)
3. TopBand: EWEs (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Wed, 01 Apr 1998 08:11:40 +0000; To: <topband@contesting.com> I agree with him, it worked that way for me...and it worked that way for W8LRL..... and about a dozen others who answered a poll I took a year or so ago. Not necessarily.; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00004.html (10,911 bytes)
4. TopBand: EWEs (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Wed, 01 Apr 1998 08:11:40 +0000; To: <topband@contesting.com> Hi Pete, I've had many Beverages in marsh land (VERY wet rich deep black dirt, 30 mS/ m) and very poor dirt, and they worked the same as over poor dirt near as I could te; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00005.html (8,037 bytes)
5. TopBand: EWEs (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham); Date: Wed, 01 Apr 1998 15:49:39 EST; Hi, Tom, "TOA is affected by ground a long distance out from a vertically polarized radiator. That has little to do with ground systems near and under the antenna." I didn't say otherwise, and I tota; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00006.html (12,298 bytes)
6. TopBand: EWEs (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 02 Apr 1998 10:01:44 +0000; To: <topband@contesting.com> Hi Earl, I appreciate your comments. I just wanted to point out Eric was dead on about a few things, at least from what I observed here and others report. Yes. One is bas; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00011.html (11,985 bytes)
7. TopBand: EWEs (score: 1): Author: Nick_Hall-Patch@bc.sympatico.ca (Nick Hall-Patch); Date: Thu, 2 Apr 1998 07:39:23 -0800 (PST); The reason why I ask is this issue Good point, Pete. My version of your reasoning was behind my decision (some years back) to run a long low wire of 600 metres from headland to headland on the Pacifi; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00012.html (8,789 bytes)
8. TopBand: EWEs (score: 1): Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson Courtesy Account); Date: Thu, 2 Apr 1998 14:25:39 -0700; To: <topband@contesting.com> The operative word in my statement was "perfect". Even sea water isn't actually perfect. Also, even though I didn't make it very clear, I was describing what happens to a; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00015.html (13,118 bytes)
9. TopBand: EWEs (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham); Date: Thu, 02 Apr 1998 22:06:41 EST; Regarding the phasing in the vertical elements of the Ewe antenna: I asked Tom, W8JI if the vertical elements were 180 degrees out of phase because one element was inverted. He aptly explained how an; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00018.html (8,622 bytes)
10. TopBand: EWEs (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Fri, 03 Apr 1998 08:33:17 +0000; To: <topband@contesting.com> Hi Earl, The EWE is easily and correctly analyzed as two short verticals. The elements are 180 out of phase. The phase delay is 41 degrees plus the 180 degree inversion.; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00022.html (9,232 bytes)
11. TopBand: EWEs (score: 1): Author: k0ha@navix.net (Bill Hohnstein); Date: Tue, 31 Mar 1998 21:13:37 -0800; I might have agree with that last year. The ground conductivity here is very high. Last year my Beverages generally were lucky to be as good as my parasitic vertical array for reception to Europe. S; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00263.html (8,248 bytes)
12. TopBand: EWEs (score: 1): Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson Courtesy Account); Date: Tue, 31 Mar 1998 09:46:07 -0700; Gary and I have been having a little discussion off line. He thinks I should post it to the reflector. So here it is. Eric -- Start of forwarded message -- Great info, Eric--I think you should share; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00527.html (11,730 bytes)
13. TopBand: EWEs (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham); Date: Tue, 31 Mar 1998 16:43:07 EST; Eric, N7CL commented that Ewes perform better over better ground. This might be true only because the ground conductivity greatly affects the TOA (in this case, the angle of max reception), but this; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00531.html (8,509 bytes)
14. TopBand: EWEs (score: 1): Author: Koch@redcross.or.at (Koch Bernhard); Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1996 09:12:04 +0200; With great interest I have been reading the recent articles about EWEs. I simulated an EWE, and found out the following: The big problem with any EWE 8what by the way does the abreviation mean) is= t; /archives//html/Topband/1996-09/msg00089.html (7,171 bytes)
15. TopBand: EWEs (score: 1): Author: W8JITom@aol.com (W8JITom@aol.com); Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1996 10:42:39 -0400; Hi Bernard I agree totally. The EWE is a simple pair of verticals with a horizontal feedline. The array is small enough current is uniform and the vertical are fed cross fore with 180 degree shift pl; /archives//html/Topband/1996-09/msg00090.html (8,015 bytes)
16. TopBand: EWEs (score: 1): Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider); Date: Sat, 14 Sep 1996 03:54:34 -0700; have a pair phased to Europe and three others East, West and South. I plan to add another in phase with the South EWE. I used the 15 ft/38 ft/ 15 ft design which, BTW, has the best pattern/gain of an; /archives//html/Topband/1996-09/msg00094.html (9,306 bytes)
17. TopBand: EWEs (score: 1): Author: W8JITom@aol.com (W8JITom@aol.com); Date: Sat, 14 Sep 1996 10:41:56 -0400; The point remains, the EWE is a pair of short phased verticals carrying uniform current with the single wire line a short phasing section. Even two small verticals can improve S/N ratio many, many dB; /archives//html/Topband/1996-09/msg00099.html (7,853 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]