Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Balloon\s+suspended\s+1\/2\s+wave\s+vertical\s+on\s+160\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Balloon\s+suspended\s+1\/2\s+wave\s+vertical\s+on\s+160\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: Balloon suspended 1/2 wave vertical on 160 (score: 1): Author: dgf@netcom.com (David Feldman); Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1998 12:39:16 -0700 (PDT); Would this be re-inventing the wheel? I'm interested in 80 and 160M vertical solutions that would not depend on radials; it seems 1/2 wave would work at first blush. Any thoughts? 73 Dave WB0GAZ dgf@; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00135.html (7,093 bytes)
2. TopBand: Balloon suspended 1/2 wave vertical on 160 (score: 1): Author: amen@earthling.net (Keith Jillings); Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1998 21:27:54 +0100; If Richard G3OQT doesn't reply first ... We tried one of these, many years ago, using UK Met Office met balloons. Fixing the wire to the balloon proved quite fun - in the end, we used a large net. Th; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00137.html (8,051 bytes)
3. TopBand: Balloon suspended 1/2 wave vertical on 160 (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham); Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1998 23:01:05 EDT; On Fri, 10 Apr 1998 12:39:16 -0700 (PDT) David Feldman <dgf@netcom.com> writes: == Any elevated or ground-mounted vertical will require radials unless it is a half-wave center fed vertical. Of course; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00138.html (8,535 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]