Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+9M0C\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+9M0C\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: 9M0C (score: 1): Author: rtym@ippt.gov.pl (Ryszard Tymkiewicz); Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 23:01:16 +0100; Hi All, 9M0C team is doing fantastic job on all bands.It seems they started on 160m just after 2020 utc on 1824,5 KHz listening usually 1,5 up with very good signal. So,I'm very happy with this new o; /archives//html/Topband/1998-02/msg00123.html (7,252 bytes)
2. TopBand: 9M0C (score: 1): Author: eldridge@direct.ca (Bob Eldridge); Date: Thu, 12 Feb 1998 07:52:44 -0800; This morning Thursday 9M0C said sorry to all those calling, their Rx antenna is not up yet and they have QRN 20 dB over 9 on the vertical. They worked several 6, 7 and VE7 with difficulty, peaked her; /archives//html/Topband/1998-02/msg00135.html (7,266 bytes)
3. TopBand: 9M0C (score: 1): Author: k7ca@accessnv.com (k7ca@accessnv.com); Date: Thu, 12 Feb 1998 18:41:33 +0000; Hello All, 9M0C started calling cq at about 10:40z on 1824.5 saying only cq up. He was 549 at first in Las Vegas coming in best on a 250 degree ant. I called several times only getting qrz "K7" once.; /archives//html/Topband/1998-02/msg00136.html (7,439 bytes)
4. TopBand: 9M0C (score: 1): Author: gjerning@flash.net (Arne Gjerning); Date: Sat, 14 Feb 1998 07:20:38 -0800; Have to echo N5IA comments. 9M0C good copy 459 in Albuquerque, NM at the same times and this on my 1 and only 160 ant A SLOPER off my 87 ft tower. Would be fantastic to get qso but fine to hear them.; /archives//html/Topband/1998-02/msg00150.html (7,238 bytes)
5. TopBand: 9M0C (score: 1): Author: jon.zaimes@dol.net (jon zaimes); Date: Sun, 15 Feb 1998 10:57:20 -0500 (EST); Apparently some W1 and W2 stations have been hearing the 9M0 the past few days. I wonder what path you've been hearing them on, and what antennas? Only heard a few whispers of their signal here on Sa; /archives//html/Topband/1998-02/msg00154.html (7,186 bytes)
6. TopBand: 9M0C (score: 1): Author: ni6t@best.com (Garry & Yelena); Date: Mon, 16 Feb 1998 08:34:53 -0800; Condx were MUCH better to and from 9M0C on topband this morning for the West Coast. K6UR reported good copy from about 11Z and was successful early. Copy was generally good on the West Coast, althoug; /archives//html/Topband/1998-02/msg00168.html (8,372 bytes)
7. TopBand: 9M0C (score: 1): Author: kl7y@Alaska.NET (Dan Robbins); Date: Thu, 19 Feb 1998 05:55:49 -0900 (AKST); Had the rig on 1824.5 for over an hour this AM, but no 9M0. Then at 1418Z, they suddenly showed up with good sigs (569) called 3 CQs and vanished before the amp even warmed up. Sigh. KL7Y -- FAQ on W; /archives//html/Topband/1998-02/msg00204.html (7,177 bytes)
8. TopBand: 9M0C (score: 1): Author: ja3aaw@sannet.ne.jp (Takeshi Yoshida); Date: Fri, 20 Feb 1998 12:44:08 +0900; I watched on 1,824.5Khz for 9M0C full time between 11:55 - 13:20z, 19-Feb. Heard them calling CQ QSX 27 ONLY ONE TIME at 1157-1158z, sig 599, and that's all. They might be looking for NA signal time; /archives//html/Topband/1998-02/msg00224.html (7,357 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]