Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:zr@jeremy.mv.com: 406 ]

Total 406 documents matching your query.

201. Re: Topband: Laird ferrites (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 18:34:47 -0400
Evaluate against what? While Ive heard of Steward in the past I see nothing on Lairds site that gives me any information to base an evaluation on. Would you buy a complete unknown product of any kind
/archives//html/Topband/2012-06/msg00255.html (9,834 bytes)

202. Re: Topband: Ferrite core (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 11:28:19 -0400
The real Fair-Rite part # is 2873000202. The BN73-202 is a made up number by Amidon which usually has the highest prices when you include shipping. Carl KM1H _________________________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00004.html (9,531 bytes)

203. Re: Topband: Ferrite core (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 14:49:32 -0400
Mouser will get them in a package of 250, they list them as available but non stocked. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00008.html (8,879 bytes)

204. Re: Topband: Laird ferrites (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 14:50:45 -0400
Maybe you just dont understand the process. In a real company a project engineer searches data sheets for something that looks good and then asks for samples. If the engineer has any experience he al
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00009.html (10,736 bytes)

205. Re: Topband: Ferrite core (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 14:52:41 -0400
Thats good to know, at that price a 100 wont even make minimum if its still $25. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00010.html (9,327 bytes)

206. Re: Topband: Laird ferrites (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 11:30:04 -0400
So who is this mysterious off brand ferrite supplier or is that a secret? Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00028.html (10,108 bytes)

207. Re: Topband: Laird ferrites (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 12:05:00 -0400
I dont know where the National engineers got their start with ferrite suppression but the basics were around since the 30's and refined during WW2. They were using beads on leads by the early 60's o
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00032.html (9,353 bytes)

208. Re: Topband: UFOs (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 16:35:06 -0400
What do you mean 3rd world? That describes the majority of the USA, present company excepted, but here they throw in a TV or monitor flyback! Carl KM1H _______________________________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00042.html (8,067 bytes)

209. Re: Topband: UFOs (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 18:14:42 -0400
Id forgotten Indiana General and their famous Q-1 cores, that was my first attempt at Beverage matching....seems eons ago. OTOH, Hayward was 44 years younger and a bit of a frugal type in keeping wit
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00045.html (10,128 bytes)

210. Re: Topband: Progress with ugly computer noise (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 12:59:12 -0400
Ditto on the Antec, Ive been using them on both the higher end PC's Ive built for several years and I dont have to keep upgrading as I change or add things. Very cool running too. Carl KM1H _________
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00059.html (11,246 bytes)

211. Re: Topband: Mother of all ferrite common-mode coaxial chokes (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 20:48:43 -0400
** Considering the YCCC's long time reputation for top level engineering ability plus the others mentioned such as K3LR Id consider that article a must read. ** Not really ** Ive been using beads ove
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00140.html (11,544 bytes)

212. Re: Topband: Mother of all ferrite common-mode coaxial chokes (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 09:04:00 -0400
Youre welcome to your opinion based upon your experience Tom. While 160 never presented any problems your rebuttal to the YCCC paper was generic and on 20-10 and also 6M I beg to differ based on my a
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00146.html (9,391 bytes)

213. Re: Topband: Connector Integrity was: Re: Mother of all ferrite common-mode coaxial chokes (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 13:50:56 -0400
Most folks with Drake, Collins, and some other vintage and pricey equipment arent about to do a Hammy Hambone conversion to better connectors. Carl KM1H ______________________________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00159.html (11,567 bytes)

214. Re: Topband: Mother of all ferrite common-mode coaxial chokes (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 13:51:04 -0400
Frank, I respect your input. In my situation I have no control over RF grounding of the equipment since the foundation is sitting in a hole blasted out of rock. Dirt all over the property is only 1-2
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00160.html (15,393 bytes)

215. Re: Topband: Mother of all ferrite common-mode coaxial chokes (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 15:09:11 -0400
** Which is strictly his opinion. Another is that Chuck ** Since when is using an established procedure called not knowing how to measure? He also didn't know ** Thats strange since he mentions the l
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00168.html (12,591 bytes)

216. Re: Topband: Mother of all ferrite common-mode coaxial chokes (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 20:44:38 -0400
What does he consider a long audio cable Paul? Ive been using 600 Ohms to run studio type equipment for the AM station. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00181.html (12,653 bytes)

217. Re: Topband: Mother of all ferrite common-mode coaxial chokes (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 21:21:33 -0400
Thats correct at UHF and up but what is the error you have actually measured at 1.8 MHz? about 100MHz. What am I missing here? _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QS
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00182.html (12,588 bytes)

218. Re: Topband: Mother of all ferrite common-mode coaxial chokes (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 21:27:49 -0400
Never mind, it was answered. Carl _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00183.html (13,987 bytes)

219. Re: Topband: Mother of all ferrite common-mode coaxial chokes (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 08:52:44 -0400
Thats what I used at work in the 80's to measure, seemed to correlate well with the expected attenuation. Ive also had one at home for about 20 years. Carl KM1H ______________________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00189.html (10,531 bytes)

220. Re: Topband: Mother of all ferrite common-mode coaxial chokes (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 09:04:28 -0400
** Define serious errors and using what for measuring? ** Ive read all that Agilent and other stuff when published since it was part of the engineering library at work. Since we were involved with 10
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00191.html (12,090 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu