Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:zedkay@bellsouth.net: 45 ]

Total 45 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: Receivers (score: 1)
Author: Charles Bibb <zedkay@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 09:15:45 -0600
OK, all this discussion about receivers for 160M has me wondering something (and this may be a big joke I'm just not aware of)... I've seen no mention of the Kenwood TS-940S, either good or bad, or i
/archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00131.html (8,402 bytes)

2. Topband: Conditions this weekend (score: 1)
Author: Charles Bibb <zedkay@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 12:34:53 -0600
Hi, fellow Topbanders, I?d like to hear some other opinions of 160M band conditions during the CQ WW CW contest. I was not impressed here. I had high hopes of snagging several new top band countries,
/archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00257.html (9,013 bytes)

3. Topband: The Forbidden Frequency (score: 1)
Author: Charles Bibb <zedkay@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 14:47:57 -0600
Hello, fellow Topbanders: Maybe this has been covered here before, but what's up with the QRM (steady carrier) on or about 1830khz? Almost everyone across the country regards 1830 as a "bad" frequenc
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00015.html (8,016 bytes)

4. Topband: Forbidden Frequency Part 2 (score: 1)
Author: Charles Bibb <zedkay@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 18:53:33 -0600
Hi, All Thanks for all the useful and informative answers to my recent post/question about the QRM on 1830khz. Perhaps, though, I should have refined my original question somewhat. I am well aware th
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00042.html (7,729 bytes)

5. Topband: Jupiter on 160 (score: 1)
Author: Charles Bibb <zedkay@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 20:53:02 -0600
Hi, Topbanders I'd like to hear from anyone with experience using the TenTec Jupiter transceiver on 160M, especially under weak-signal DXing and contest conditions. Are you pleased or disappointed wi
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00354.html (6,976 bytes)

6. Topband: DX-Edge (score: 1)
Author: Charles Bibb <zedkay@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 15:30:30 -0600
Hi, Topbanders, Could someone please direct me to where I can obtain software (purchase or free, doesn't matter) for my PC that will do the same thing as my old plastic (and very worn out) DX-Edge? I
/archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00107.html (7,002 bytes)

7. Topband: DX-Edge (score: 1)
Author: Charles Bibb <zedkay@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 22:16:40 -0600
Thanks to all those who responded to my query. "DX Atlas" got the most recommendations. 73, Charles K5ZK _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com ht
/archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00112.html (6,712 bytes)

8. Topband: 5B (score: 1)
Author: Charles Bibb <zedkay@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 05:46:07 -0500
Hi, all Has anyone received a 160M QSL from 5B/K3UY for his operation last February? If so, what's the trick? Both my requests have gone unanswered. Thanks, Charles - K5ZK ___________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2005-10/msg00128.html (6,344 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Moonlight & K-sums (score: 1)
Author: Charles Bibb <zedkay@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 19:13:19 -0500
Has anyone else considered that if propagation conditions on topband are indeed enhanced by a full moon or a harvest moon that the effect might have more to do with tidal effects on the ionosphere th
/archives//html/Topband/2005-10/msg00160.html (8,626 bytes)

10. Topband: Slinky vs. Loading (score: 1)
Author: Charles Bibb <zedkay@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:15:23 -0600
This is related to the "Slinky Beverage" thread currently being discussed on the list. My experience(s) may help others considering a beverage of less-than-optimum length. And, maybe someone can give
/archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00055.html (10,365 bytes)

11. Topband: Technology QSO's (score: 1)
Author: Charles Bibb <zedkay@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 16:40:52 -0600
Pat, N8VW, wrote: If a contact is so hard to make that it requires coordination over a more reliable facility then what is the point of making that contact? Or, more to the point, I would say, "what
/archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00160.html (7,753 bytes)

12. Topband: ARRL 160M Test (score: 1)
Author: Charles Bibb <zedkay@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 18:51:11 -0600
Hi, All I decided to do something a little different in this year's ARRL 160M contest. My goal was to see how close I could get to 160M WAS running QRP - 5 Watts output. Besides being quite a challen
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00030.html (7,498 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: "Magnetic Receiving Loop / small loop , brief summary. (score: 1)
Author: Charles Bibb <zedkay@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 12:33:42 -0600
OK, I'll bite. What is an "eight circle array"? Details? 73, Charles (not afraid to display my ignorance) - K5ZK _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contestin
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00280.html (8,418 bytes)

14. Topband: WEIRD condx last night (score: 1)
Author: Charles Bibb <zedkay@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 08:44:08 -0600
Hi, topbanders All these glowing reports of amazing conditions last night have me somewhat puzzled (and pulling my hair out). Is there such a thing as "ANTI-searchlight" propagation? I know there was
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00315.html (7,779 bytes)

15. Topband: Electric fences (score: 1)
Author: Charles Bibb <zedkay@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:12:25 -0600
Hi, All Need a little info (and maybe some help) on QRM/RFI caused by electric fences. I know many of you have this problem and may have been able to solve RX difficulties caused by them First, what
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00338.html (7,087 bytes)

16. Topband: Electric fences (score: 1)
Author: Charles Bibb <zedkay@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:13:58 -0600
Thanks to all who responded to my query about electric fence noise. I think I may know where to look now. 73, Charles - K5ZK _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topba
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00344.html (7,398 bytes)

17. Topband: Line Noise and Entergy (score: 1)
Author: Charles Bibb <zedkay@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:22:50 -0600
Would anyone on this list who is an Entergy customer and who has been successful in getting that company to resolve a line noise problem PLEASE contact me. I'm desperate! Charles - K5ZK _____________
/archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00183.html (6,384 bytes)

18. Re: Topband: MFJ-1026 Noise Cancellation (score: 1)
Author: Charles Bibb <zedkay@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 08:49:15 -0600
Interesting results, Tod I have had exactly the opposite experience with my MFJ-1026. In fact, at my QTH I have found it to be absolutely, totally useless. Worse than useless, actually, in that in N
/archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00302.html (8,198 bytes)

19. Re: Topband: MFJ-1026 Noise Cancellation (score: 1)
Author: Charles Bibb <zedkay@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 13:56:39 -0600
I've been trying the MFJ-1026 again today during daytime while the band is devoid of signals and QRN propagated by the ionosphere. I wanted to concentrate only on my specific local noise source(s). G
/archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00313.html (9,323 bytes)

20. Topband: MFJ-1026 (score: 1)
Author: Charles Bibb <zedkay@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 08:28:39 -0600
Thanks to all who have provided ideas/suggestions/tips, etc. for using the MFJ-1026. And, while I still haven't been able to improve my S/N ratio to any useful degree with it, I have not give up - ye
/archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00325.html (6,428 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu