Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ws6x@comcast.net: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: K3EQ Vertical (score: 1)
Author: "WS6X" <ws6x@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:04:51 -0800
GE Bill, I'm curious if that article might have been published in any other ARRL antenna books. I don't have access to Sept. 81 QST. Thanks, Jim - WS6X _______________________________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00082.html (6,184 bytes)

2. Topband: K3EQ Vertical (score: 1)
Author: "WS6X" <ws6x@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:25:28 -0800
== == Thanks Again, Jim - WS6X _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
/archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00088.html (7,751 bytes)

3. Topband: Receiving Loop (score: 1)
Author: "WS6X" <ws6x@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 07:05:22 -0800
Does anyone on this reflector have experience with "The Monster Loop" by WA3USG, as described in September 2000 QST? (Adjusted for 160/80M operation, of course.) I am particularly interested in comme
/archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00150.html (7,208 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Receive Loop (score: 1)
Author: "WS6X" <ws6x@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 13:58:53 -0800
Hello Again, Thanks to all who responded off line. Several have asked what the heck a "Monster Loop" is. The Monster Loop is basically a 10-turn, square loop in a diamond orientation, roughly 12 feet
/archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00158.html (6,616 bytes)

5. Topband: Monster Loop Summary (score: 1)
Author: "WS6X" <ws6x@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:04:40 -0800
I received several requests to post a summary to this reflector regarding the Monster Loop. While no one came forward with specific information about that design, several offered comments about other
/archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00184.html (8,155 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Monster Loop Summary (score: 1)
Author: "WS6X" <ws6x@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 18:22:29 -0800
I must have fat-fingered the VE7SL link. It should be . . ./Loop.html, instead of .htm. Sorry, Jim - WS6X _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com h
/archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00189.html (6,549 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: ARRL 160 Contest (score: 1)
Author: "WS6X" <ws6x@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 16:44:15 -0800
Thot I'd throw out my one & one-half cents worth. Both evenings of the contest at 45 minutes on either side of local sunset, the Central Valley of CA had pipeline condx to the Caribbean. Friday at 3:
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00029.html (7,471 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Stew Perry Contest Plaque Thank You (score: 1)
Author: "WS6X" <ws6x@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 16:33:04 -0700
I too, echo Pat, N8VW's sentiments re the SP Contest. It is truly a well thought-out, delightful contest. Here's my thanks to all the brain power, experience and dedication behind its conception and
/archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00044.html (7,204 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: 160 "Spotlight" (score: 1)
Author: ws6x@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 03:03:31 +0000
For me, the most dramatic example of this "spotlight effect" was in Nov. 2005 when the TZ gang was gearing up for CQWWCW. I stalked them on 160 for several evenings and never once heard so much as a
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00049.html (7,872 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: 1.810 BCB interference (score: 1)
Author: ws6x@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 22:36:41 +0000
The carrier is just audible here at 8:50 am local time near San Diego, just above my abysmally high S7 noise floor (in the 250 Hz filter). It was much stronger on Saturday night during the Stew, maki
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00069.html (8,943 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: 1.810 BCB interference (score: 1)
Author: ws6x@comcast.net
Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 14:47:05 +0000
I don't know what the other W6 / W7stations are hearing on 1810, but for us in the Fresno area the audio is without a doubt, KXEX. This is always the prominant audio (sometimes the only audio). You c
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00091.html (9,522 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: 1.810 BCB interference (score: 1)
Author: "WS6X" <ws6x@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 07:23:09 -0800
their ID at 1300z this morning. Funny, when I >go to 1550 can't hear their signal, other BCB stations. == Peter, I would like you to do one more check. The next time you are copying the KXEX program
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00115.html (8,361 bytes)

13. Topband: 1810 Spur Update (score: 1)
Author: "WS6X" <ws6x@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 19:06:26 -0800
Several of us Topband Reflector-ees have contacted the engineer in charge at KAVT here in Fresno calling his attention to the strong spur on 1810. Paul, the engineer, aka N6MUK, responded very prompt
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00262.html (7,028 bytes)

14. Topband: 1810 Revisited (score: 1)
Author: "WS6X" <ws6x@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 10:13:13 -0800
Paul, the engineer at KAVT here in Fresno, installed a filter in the KAVT transmitter yesterday (01/31). After adjustment, he measured ". . . a very significant decrease in the inter-modulation spur
/archives//html/Topband/2007-02/msg00007.html (6,931 bytes)

15. Topband: Half Slopers (score: 1)
Author: "WS6X" <ws6x@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 07:03:20 -0800
I have some questions about the top loading in shunt-fed tower systems in general, and more specific to my case, half slopers (which have been described as "a lazy man's shunt-fed tower"). 1. Other t
/archives//html/Topband/2008-02/msg00014.html (7,222 bytes)

16. Re: Topband: Noise Cancellation / Low Dipole (score: 1)
Author: "Jim - WS6X" <ws6x@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 14:50:04 -0700
Today's Topics: 1. Noise Cancellation Options? (Walter Miller, AJ6T) 8. Low Dipole for RX (GALE STEWARD) == Walt & Gale, I'll chime in with my experience that relates to both questions. I live in a v
/archives//html/Topband/2009-10/msg00022.html (8,837 bytes)

17. Re: Topband: 'Spud Gun' (score: 1)
Author: "Jim - WS6X" <ws6x@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:49:12 -0700
== I'd love to see plans for that Spud Gun, Gary (or anyone)/.....I've been using a fishing rod for years but it's not entirely accurate and I've been "caught up" in the tops of trees more than once.
/archives//html/Topband/2010-03/msg00103.html (8,218 bytes)

18. Re: Topband: The Slingshot Option (score: 1)
Author: "Jim - WS6X" <ws6x@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:53:24 -0700
Message: 2 Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:07:30 -0800 From: Gary and Kathleen Pearse <pearse@gci.net> Subject: Re: Topband: The Slingshot Option To: topband List <topband@contesting.com> Message-ID: <9C9D
/archives//html/Topband/2010-10/msg00076.html (7,305 bytes)

19. Re: Topband: 160m U shaped open loop (score: 1)
Author: "Jim - WS6X" <ws6x@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:24:27 -0700
4. 160m U shaped open loop (vk3pa@vk3pa.com) Message: 4 Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 22:35:58 -0500 From: vk3pa@vk3pa.com Subject: Topband: 160m U shaped open loop To: topband@contesting.com Message-ID: <2
/archives//html/Topband/2011-03/msg00094.html (8,104 bytes)

20. Topband: Very Nasty Noise (score: 1)
Author: "WS6X" <ws6x@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 17:20:42 -0800
I am forwarding this request for a local friend, Vic, K2VCO. He recently started hearing an incredibly wide noise at 1.825 +/-. He can null it with his 2-element DXE active system, but doesn't know p
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00048.html (6,977 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu