Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wi5a@sbcglobal.net: 49 ]

Total 49 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: WD-1A and the DX Engineering Reversible Beverage System (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:48:16 -0500
Has anyone used WD-1A telephone field wire with the DX Engineering RBS-1P Reversible Beverage System? Results? What is the impedance of WD-1A? Larry K5RK _____________________________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2008-08/msg00046.html (7,023 bytes)

2. Topband: 3DA0ZO (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:20:52 -0500
Has anyone received a card from this station for the November 2007 operation? If so how did you get it? I sent to the Panama address as instructed but cannot seem to get a response via mail or e-mail
/archives//html/Topband/2008-08/msg00053.html (6,320 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: CQWW160 Remote receiver rule (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 12:27:00 -0600
Unfortunately, remotes are allowed by DXCC.... including the ones you access with a credit card (e.g., RemoteHamRadio.com). In fact, you don't even need a radio these days to get on Honor Roll. Not
/archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00123.html (10,692 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: CQWW160 Remote receiver rule (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 18:31:12 -0600
Yep. All you need nowadays is a credit card. You can be on Honor Roll without ever seeing a radio or antenna. Gotta be a little like kissing your sister. ARRL is going to stand for American Remote Ra
/archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00295.html (10,507 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: CQWW160 Remote receiver rule (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 19:55:49 -0600
Agree... let's cut out the middleman and just pay for a QSL directly. Tom's suggestion was a valid one. If we don't like the direction the ARRL has been heading with this we should let our DXAC rep,
/archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00300.html (10,703 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: CQWW160 Remote receiver rule (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 08:50:28 -0600
move anywhere or operate anywhere and collect DXCC. phone to "help" them get a new country. on in various forms since the 1970's, at least. There were ethically-challenged individuals in DXCC then,
/archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00311.html (9,564 bytes)

7. Topband: Proposal for Modification of DXCC Rules (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 13:50:16 -0600
A few days ago someone on the reflector suggested "if you don't like the DXCC rules get them changed". Here's a proposal designed to maintain a certain amount of integrity in the DXCC program while a
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00089.html (8,726 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Foreign stns using NA remotes for K1N (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 15:02:35 -0600
Amen. One commercial remote business advertises "completely anonymous operation". It's the ham radio version of the No-Tell Motel. Sure, it could be someone else's station. I heard the IT9 "QSO" desc
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00103.html (10,905 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Foreign stns using NA remotes for K1N (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 20:33:40 -0600
There have always been the ethically-challenged among us. No one is denying that. What I sense is a realization by many that DXCC, a program that some of us naively believed was a credible accomplis
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00131.html (9,655 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: Foreign stns using NA remotes for K1N (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 20:47:47 -0600
It's actually worse than that, Jim. One doesn't even need a K3/0. All you need is a computer and an internet connection. RHR's advertising is aimed at the simplicity of it all -- "$99 and you are on
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00134.html (12,041 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Foreign stns using NA remotes for K1N (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 21:04:57 -0600
Dave... I actually addressed most of this with a proposal earlier today on how DXCC could be changed to accommodate these situations. If you didn't see it, I can forward you a copy. - Larry K5RK Remo
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00137.html (10,530 bytes)

12. Topband: DX recognition (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 06:59:12 -0600
more worthwhile? It might come to that one day, Larry. With LoTW being a major feeder into DXCC credits, it would take a lot of work for someone else to pick this up and run with it. But there is ce
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00156.html (7,144 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: RHR and remote topic (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 16:08:48 -0600
With all due respect, such complaints are really kinda sad. Considering the long term implications, this topic is one of the more important ones discussed here in a long time -- and there continue to
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00206.html (8,197 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: Out-of-Turn Callers DX Expedition finances (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 07:48:35 -0600
Agree, Tim. No need for bragging by contributors. The flip side is there should be no complaining by those who don't (or even those who do!). - Larry K5RK I turn on the news every day and hear about
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00309.html (9,143 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 10:56:05 -0600
With all due respect, Mike, these things are within your control and the DXpedition should not be held responsible for you not being able to work them. You'll find DXing way more fun when you upgrade
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00519.html (7,856 bytes)

16. Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 12:52:07 -0600
Mike, no one is "jumping all over you". As has already been pointed out by someone else, one thing that is in your control is your license class. This expedition was announced several months ago, not
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00522.html (11,827 bytes)

17. Re: Topband: Yikes (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 20:22:55 -0600
A bargain at twice the price. Larry K5RK K1N club log is now up. First QSO costs $6.00 USD. That's got to be the most expensive I have seen. Anyone top that one. I am not complaining! Doug "There are
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00544.html (8,022 bytes)

18. Re: Topband: Yikes (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 20:32:25 -0600
Their website shows the various ways to get a card. The $6 fee is for ClubLog, which is very convienient. QSL methods: U.S.A. Direct: Minimum S.A.S.E. (Self-Addressed Stamped Envelope) World Direct:
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00548.html (8,828 bytes)

19. Topband: Rules vs. Ethics (was Brave New World) (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:45:47 -0600
but it is fully sanctioned by the ARRL. Jim stated as much in the note to which you are replying. What is in play here is the difference between laws/rules and ethics. Just because something is "leg
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00691.html (8,193 bytes)

20. Re: Topband: Rules vs. Ethics (was Brave New World) (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 16:23:51 -0600
or damaged someone, somehow I guess that depends on how you define "harmed". If you are expecting manslaughter, I doubt you'll find an example of that. I cited an example of how this is not victimle
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00693.html (12,080 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu