Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wes_n7ws@triconet.org: 290 ]

Total 290 documents matching your query.

101. Re: Topband: Boring Report - N6TR (score: 1)
Author: Wes Stewart <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 13:08:54 -0700
I heard you in Tucson with a good signal (559) this morning 1 hour after my sunrise. Wes  N7WS This morning - RA4LW checked in with a good signal - but no other Europeans were worked. I have worked a
/archives//html/Topband/2018-12/msg00165.html (8,053 bytes)

102. Re: Topband: Band Report (score: 1)
Author: Wes Stewart <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 16:16:29 -0700
I heard TZ4AM last night here in AZ on my one and only antenna, my 55' inverted-L.  I didn't call, since I've worked him before. Wes  N7WS. On 12/17/2018 3:33 PM, Gary Smith wrote: Last night around
/archives//html/Topband/2018-12/msg00171.html (7,719 bytes)

103. Re: Topband: Inverted L improvement question (score: 1)
Author: Wes Stewart <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 14:48:52 -0700
My opinion is that it adds unwanted horizontal radiation.  Some will argue that the current in the upper part of vertical radiator is increased, but so is the current in the horizontal part, somethin
/archives//html/Topband/2018-12/msg00181.html (9,670 bytes)

104. Re: Topband: choke/bleeder resistor on RXvertical? (score: 1)
Author: Wes Stewart <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 06:15:46 -0700
Noise is signal spread over a large bandwidth,  We tune our receivers to a frequency to copy signals in a relatively narrow bandwidth.  Nevertheless, there is some of that noise in that same bandwidt
/archives//html/Topband/2018-12/msg00200.html (8,303 bytes)

105. Re: Topband: Inverted L improvement question (score: 1)
Author: Wes Stewart <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 07:04:49 -0700
Although licensed for 60 years I'm a relative newby on topband.  (I did work VE7 in 1959 but that's another story).  I decided to semi-seriously take up the band to acquire my 9th DXCC band award. As
/archives//html/Topband/2018-12/msg00219.html (11,330 bytes)

106. Re: Topband: Inverted L improvement question (score: 1)
Author: Wes Stewart <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 15:20:20 -0700
I just drove down to the local convenience store and bought some Powerball tickets.  If I win, there's a nice 80 acre parcel across the street from me that I would buy.  Until then, I'm stuck on a 1.
/archives//html/Topband/2018-12/msg00236.html (9,000 bytes)

107. Re: Topband: Inverted L improvement question (score: 1)
Author: Wes Stewart <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2018 09:34:22 -0700
Jeff, et.al. 1)  Yes, I am on 1.7 acres (2 AC - easements).  Some guys would love this much land, to farmers it's just enough room for the barn.  Regardless, considering I also have a house, a tower
/archives//html/Topband/2018-12/msg00276.html (12,300 bytes)

108. Re: Topband: Inverted L improvement question (score: 1)
Author: Wes Stewart <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2018 08:50:14 -0700
I was an early participant in the SAL yahoo group and introduced Dan, AC6LA, to the group.  He has provided a lot of modeling tools. That said, I lost interest after feeling that the design was too c
/archives//html/Topband/2018-12/msg00291.html (10,815 bytes)

109. Re: Topband: EK8ZT on Topband FT8 (score: 1)
Author: Wes Stewart <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2018 11:18:58 -0700
[sigh] _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2018-12/msg00299.html (7,000 bytes)

110. Re: Topband: Inverted L improvement question - Part 2 (score: 1)
Author: Wes Stewart <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 10:15:03 -0700
I could give other advice but the best that I could offer is to check out Rudy's, N6LF, site: https://www.antennasbyn6lf.com/  Regrettably, this isn't all that he's published so further searching mig
/archives//html/Topband/2019-01/msg00012.html (7,775 bytes)

111. Re: Topband: QRG on 160 in North and South America (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:01:23 -0700
I have heard them on 1829.4 here in Arizona. Wes  N7WS We are preparing our WEB page for 7P8 In March this year. I am aware about fish beacon and bad QRG`s seen from Northern EU, JA`s basically from
/archives//html/Topband/2019-01/msg00062.html (7,953 bytes)

112. Re: Topband: Inverted L improvements - Part 3 (now with data) (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 13:21:14 -0700
I started this message a day or so ago.  Others have commented since with some similar thoughts, nevertheless, here is my take. Todd you're going the wrong direction. The feed point resistance should
/archives//html/Topband/2019-01/msg00084.html (12,719 bytes)

113. Re: Topband: Inverted L improvements - Part 3 (now with data) (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 13:24:40 -0700
Really?  Why? Wes  N7WS _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2019-01/msg00085.html (9,156 bytes)

114. Re: Topband: Inverted L improvements - Part 3 (now with data) (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 11:34:07 -0700
Your "apparent" and mine are different because it isn't apparent to me that I advocated that.  I offered a possible explanation to what Todd is observing and provided the title of a reference source
/archives//html/Topband/2019-01/msg00103.html (8,979 bytes)

115. Re: Topband: Inverted L improvements - Part 3 (now with data) (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 16:35:03 -0700
As always Frank makes good points.  In my case my one lowly tower is 90 feet from the inverted-L and in fact supports the horizontal wire.  It's much too short to exhibit any resonance near topband,
/archives//html/Topband/2019-01/msg00112.html (10,874 bytes)

116. Re: Topband: Fw: really good conditions (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2019 20:07:13 -0700
I'm not a contester but do look for new ones during contests.  Big bust for me.  EUs were non-existent. D4C was strong, but apparently deaf to the west.  I'm guessing using an RX antenna looking to E
/archives//html/Topband/2019-01/msg00132.html (8,499 bytes)

117. Re: Topband: FT-8 (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 05:27:50 -0700
A great summary of my feelings. Wes  N7WS in the speaker. I love that technology is marching forward, BUT I want to be there with it. I am with CW and SSB and to a much lesser degree RTTY (I do a vy
/archives//html/Topband/2019-02/msg00002.html (8,064 bytes)

118. Re: Topband: : V84SAA (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2019 05:56:37 -0700
I first worked them on 160 on 2/8 @1201Z.  Very marginal so tried again with a sure QSO @1222Z. Went to 80 and worked them @1404Z.  This one didn't show when it should have in Clublog, so worked them
/archives//html/Topband/2019-02/msg00103.html (8,393 bytes)

119. Re: Topband: 10 Feb SS REPORT V84SAA (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2019 08:00:45 -0700
You are still speaker copy in Tucson over 45 minutes past my SR. Wes  N7WS On 2/10/2019 7:57 AM, k1zm-- via Topband wrote: Little to report to  the NA East Coast at our SS time - worked only N4IS - I
/archives//html/Topband/2019-02/msg00105.html (7,442 bytes)

120. Re: Topband: : V84SAA (score: 1)
Author: Wes N7WS <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2019 12:32:59 -0700
I second all that Larry. Maybe I should've called again this morning to break the monotony but I did see on the scope others were calling and I didn't want to QRM them. Wes. N7WS Sent from my iPhone
/archives//html/Topband/2019-02/msg00107.html (10,529 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu