Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wa8jxm@gmail.com: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Using a DX-Engineering 80m vertical as part of an inverted L on 160? (score: 1)
Author: WA8JXM <wa8jxm@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 10:20:58 -0400
I am wondering if anyone has used a DX-Engineering 80m vertical as the vertical part and the support for a 160m inverted L, connecting the rest of the required length to the top. Of course there woul
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00003.html (7,475 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Radials help (score: 1)
Author: WA8JXM <wa8jxm@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 07:54:52 -0500
Everything I read says that it doesn't make any difference whether it is insulated or not. One good idea I saw for getting the radials hidden is to use a lawn edger to make a narrow slot. For your dr
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00054.html (7,797 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Radials help (score: 1)
Author: WA8JXM <wa8jxm@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 07:30:26 -0500
Even above ground (as electric fence) that Tractor Supply fence wire rusts pretty quickly. I don't think it would be worth the effort to bury it. Many years ago, I bought a mile of aluminum electric
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00073.html (7,773 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: contesting in a field (score: 1)
Author: WA8JXM <wa8jxm@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:57:20 -0500
Chris, If the tall trees are in a location that you can get the trailer near, I would go in that direction. Put up an inverted L and lay a bunch of radials on the ground. If you are close to a good f
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00109.html (9,424 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: ARRL 160 Conditions, Key Clicks (score: 1)
Author: Ken <wa8jxm@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 18:13:46 -0500
Sounds like an easy way to eliminate the competition: just report them for having a bad signal. :-( This isn't back in the crystal controlled days when you were fixed in your frequency, your can chan
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00062.html (7,394 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: ARRL 160 conditions/zero beat (score: 1)
Author: Ken <wa8jxm@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 11:49:09 -0500
A few points on the zero beat issue: Some rigs are difficult to "zero beat". For example, my TS-440: 1) does not have a ZB function 2) uses a 800 Hz offset while I prefer to listen to a lower tone (6
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00087.html (8,259 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Nice QRPP QSO (score: 1)
Author: Ken <wa8jxm@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 08:33:57 -0500
I agree, there is not a whole lot of activity on 160 cw or digital even though the band is quite capable. Activity seems to be mostly devoted to contesting and DX, (or SSB.) Ken WA8JXM ______________
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00211.html (7,665 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Nice QRPP QSO (score: 1)
Author: Ken <wa8jxm@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 10:52:05 -0500
The Ham world needs to get their act together! Not complaining about your advice Eddy, but just yesterday I found the IARU recommended 160m bandplan (dated October 2010): 1800-1810 digi modes 1810-18
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00219.html (8,543 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Nice QRPP QSO (score: 1)
Author: Ken <wa8jxm@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 15:12:59 -0500
Carl, QRP may be fun for the QRP station but it's often a PITA for the station on the other end. I'm not saying that most of us need a KW on CW, I sold my SB220 in 1974. But I hate trying to dig some
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00231.html (8,715 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: QRP Question (score: 1)
Author: Ken <wa8jxm@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 12:06:02 -0500
I think it is a plea to accept their weak signal and work them. Or an explanation as to why they are so weak. For some, it may be a brag. Ken WA8JXM _______________________________________________ UR
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00252.html (8,256 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: QRP Question (score: 1)
Author: Ken <wa8jxm@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 11:01:09 -0500
"Roger" is proper for phone use, it's the old phonetic for R. Just a plain "R" is proper for CW or keyboard use. Ken WA8JXM _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB Q
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00310.html (8,756 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: Digital on 160m? (score: 1)
Author: Ken <wa8jxm@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 14:19:15 -0500
Are you saying we will be banned for for answering the original question about frequencies? Or just grumping about the use of 160? Ken WA8JXM _______________________________________________ UR RST IS
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00590.html (7,910 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: Using 4 - 6 elevated radials in lieu of 120 buried wires (score: 1)
Author: Ken WA8JXM <wa8jxm@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 23:56:53 -0500
Very interesting, thanks for sharing. I have seen similar information in one of the ARRL manuals, that elevated, insulated radials are more efficient than the typical ham buried 30 or 40 radials Perh
/archives//html/Topband/2024-01/msg00021.html (8,586 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: Using 4 - 6 elevated radials in lieu of 120 buried wires (score: 1)
Author: Ken WA8JXM <wa8jxm@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 03:57:20 -0500
Actually WLW, 700, Cincinnati reduced their tower height to raise their angle so that the "first hop" hit the Columbus market, about 100 miles away. I believe this was after their 500KW era. BTW, th
/archives//html/Topband/2024-01/msg00026.html (13,141 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: Remotes (score: 1)
Author: Ken WA8JXM <wa8jxm@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 23:19:38 -0500
Why is it important what someone else does? Doesn't our fulfillment come from what **we** do? I admit, I'm not a competitive person. I prefer to be amazed at what I can do with my own skills, includi
/archives//html/Topband/2024-02/msg00020.html (11,480 bytes)

16. Re: Topband: Remotes (score: 1)
Author: Ken WA8JXM <wa8jxm@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 21:05:40 -0500
I agree with Mark. Can I claim a 5000 mile 2m QSO by remotely operating a station 4999 miles away that can communicate with the DX station in the same village? Ken WA8JXM _________________ Searchable
/archives//html/Topband/2024-02/msg00039.html (9,212 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu