- 1. Topband: Portable 160M Antenna Options (score: 1)
- Author: "WA7VNI" <wa7vni@dayshaw.net>
- Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:48:12 -0800
- Hi All, I've been playing around with the idea of trying the next 160 M contest from a portable location. Here's the deal. Any thoughts on the installation described below will be appreciated. I can
- /archives//html/Topband/2003-11/msg00166.html (8,742 bytes)
- 2. RE: Topband: Portable 160M Antenna Options (score: 1)
- Author: "WA7VNI" <wa7vni@dayshaw.net>
- Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 12:47:22 -0800
- I guess I should have mentioned that the reason I wanted to try the portable operation was to have a better 160M antenna/ground than the small dipole with the openwire feedline shorted and fed as a l
- /archives//html/Topband/2003-11/msg00167.html (7,852 bytes)
- 3. RE: Topband: dx window (score: 1)
- Author: "WA7VNI" <wa7vni@dayshaw.net>
- Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:10:00 -0800
- Nicely stated Tom. Your sentiments bring back memories of *The Amateur's Code* that used to appear in the front of every ARRL publication. I seem to remember words like considerate, loyal, progressiv
- /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00314.html (9,517 bytes)
- 4. RE: Topband: 160m int L (score: 1)
- Author: "WA7VNI" <wa7vni@dayshaw.net>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 20:11:05 -0800
- Gregg, Rather than go with the *traditional L* you might want to consider a *Top Fed L*. W4RNL has all the data you need on his site here: http://www.cebik.com/radio.html The specific article on Top
- /archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00053.html (8,316 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu