- 41. Topband: Vertical array (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(K5MWH)" <w5uc@suddenlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:04:50 -0600
- Please consider the following: A receiving array consisting of two Hi-Z Elements like those used by K7TJR in his 8 element array. Spacing is 1/8 WL. EZ-Nec says at 23 degrees elevation the gain is ma
- /archives//html/Topband/2007-12/msg00104.html (7,085 bytes)
- 42. Re: Topband: Vertical array (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(K5MWH)" <w5uc@suddenlink.net>
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 07:15:56 -0600
- Bingo Lee. You nailed it! Looking at the effect of varying the phase by a small amount my simple mind said: I don't know the angle at which local interference arrives. The only thing I can guestimate
- /archives//html/Topband/2007-12/msg00108.html (8,885 bytes)
- 43. Re: Topband: Vertical array (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(K5MWH)" <w5uc@suddenlink.net>
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:49:54 -0600
- Good Evening All: My goodness! What a great collection of inputs, many about devices I was unaware existed. The MFJ devices might be a solution. Others mentioned are priced at levels that are totally
- /archives//html/Topband/2007-12/msg00113.html (8,405 bytes)
- 44. Topband: Daytime QSO (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(k5MWH) Watson" <w5uc@suddenlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 14:46:25 -0600
- Good Afternoon All: Two contacts today around 18Z. Worked WD5R near Little Rock, and W0UO near Ft. Worth. Both are roughly 250 miles from me here in Em21pi. WD5R was strong running 1KW W0UO was Q5 bu
- /archives//html/Topband/2008-01/msg00072.html (6,614 bytes)
- 45. Topband: Detuning an Antenna (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(k5MWH) Watson" <w5uc@suddenlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:48:28 -0600
- Good Morning Gents: Please let me pose the following question: I have an inverted L. At the bottom is a matching network consisting of two variable capacitors & an inductor in a T Network. Of course,
- /archives//html/Topband/2008-01/msg00118.html (7,448 bytes)
- 46. Re: Topband: Filters and grounding and receiver shielding (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(k5MWH) Watson" <w5uc@suddenlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:57:02 -0600
- Good Evening All: I will stick my neck out here, and admit that I am totally uneducated when it comes to "common mode" problems. So, let me ask: What are the symptoms of common mode problems, and how
- /archives//html/Topband/2008-01/msg00124.html (8,964 bytes)
- 47. Topband: 6W/DK8YY (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(k5MWH) Watson" <w5uc@suddenlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:40:24 -0600
- For those who may be trying to confirm 6W/DK8YY, I received the following: the online-log is an old one from our first dx-ped. to 6W in 2000! i have checked in the 2007-log .. there you have a topban
- /archives//html/Topband/2008-01/msg00158.html (7,497 bytes)
- 48. Topband: OZ7YY (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(k5MWH) Watson" <w5uc@suddenlink.net>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 06:52:16 -0600
- Good Morning All: For those who have worked OZ7YY and are waiting for him to upload to LOTW, It will not happen unless you worked him in a contest. I sent an e-mail asking him to upload, and received
- /archives//html/Topband/2008-01/msg00207.html (8,476 bytes)
- 49. Topband: OZ7YY (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(k5MWH) Watson" <w5uc@suddenlink.net>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:38:37 -0600
- Greetings Once again: I have had several off reflector inquiries about Finn's comments on LOTW charges, Unfortunately, I don't have any answers as I just reported what he sent to me. I will send him
- /archives//html/Topband/2008-01/msg00209.html (7,523 bytes)
- 50. Topband: OZ7YY QSL's (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(k5MWH) Watson" <w5uc@suddenlink.net>
- Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2008 21:58:34 -0600
- Greetings All: My apologies for not getting this response back sooner. I went off to camp out with some fellow hams for a "Guy's weekend out" Finn was kind enough to elaborate about his use of LOTW.
- /archives//html/Topband/2008-02/msg00013.html (7,303 bytes)
- 51. Re: Topband: 160/80 Sloping Inverted L (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(K5MWH) Watson" <w5uc@suddenlink.net>
- Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 08:00:48 -0500
- Good Morning Pat & all: Pat, I am using an Inverted L very similar to what you describe, on 160 only. The vertical portion goes up to 65 feet, and the horizontal portion slopes down to about 30 feet.
- /archives//html/Topband/2008-07/msg00015.html (9,007 bytes)
- 52. Re: Topband: W5SUS (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(K5MWH) Watson" <w5uc@suddenlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:08:37 -0500
- This is quite sad. I lived in Rogers, AR for several years, and occasionally went by to visit with John. After I left that area I often wondered what happened to him. Thanks for the update on a great
- /archives//html/Topband/2008-07/msg00081.html (7,830 bytes)
- 53. Topband: TA1KA/2 (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(K5MWH) Watson" <w5uc@suddenlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:23:46 -0500
- Greetings All: Gentlemen I will make this my last plea and effort to confirm this contact. If nothing comes of it this time I will remove it from my electronic logging program. TA1KA/2, worked Dec 11
- /archives//html/Topband/2008-07/msg00090.html (7,464 bytes)
- 54. Re: Topband: TA1KA/2 (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(K5MWH) Watson" <w5uc@suddenlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:48:08 -0500
- Price, many thanks. TA1KA was active in the late 80's, but For several years I have searched for a QSL route with no positive results. I found one reference saying that DL8YR was the manager for him
- /archives//html/Topband/2008-07/msg00094.html (8,088 bytes)
- 55. Topband: TA1KA/2 Follow Up (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(K5MWH) Watson" <w5uc@suddenlink.net>
- Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 10:07:12 -0500
- Good Morning all: Many thanks to all who responded. There may be a glimmer of hope as it appears that DL8YR was the QSL mgr for this station. With generous help from Uli, DJ2YA, DL8YR has been contac
- /archives//html/Topband/2008-07/msg00096.html (6,869 bytes)
- 56. Re: Topband: Claiming 160m DXCC - Sending QSLs (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(K5MWH)" <w5uc@suddenlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 09:38:39 -0500
- May I also add my congratulations. For those attending Hamcom 2009, I believe there will be a qualified 160 meter checker there this year. 73, Mike, W5UC _____________________________________________
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-05/msg00114.html (7,636 bytes)
- 57. Topband: Isolating a TX antenna (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(K5MWH)" <w5uc@suddenlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:38:39 -0500
- Greetings All: I just finished building a vertical RX array for 160 meters using K7TJR's Hi-Z pre-amps. However, it looks like I am getting some re-radiation from my Inverted L. The nearest vertical
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-08/msg00064.html (7,413 bytes)
- 58. Re: Topband: Isolating a Tx antenna (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(K5MWH)" <w5uc@suddenlink.net>
- Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:06:37 -0500
- Wow, I have received numerous comments on my question, and the results are unanimous. That being to let the Inverted L float when in the receive mode. This is fairly easy to implement, and shall be d
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-08/msg00070.html (7,234 bytes)
- 59. Topband: Small/City Lot RX Antenna (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(K5MWH)" <w5uc@suddenlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:43:21 -0500
- Greetings All: I have watched with interest the discussion here regarding getting more activity on 160, and the receive antenna problems for us who are city dwellers, and/or have small lots. I live o
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-10/msg00221.html (8,493 bytes)
- 60. Topband: Antenna (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(K5MWH)" <w5uc@suddenlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:39:08 -0500
- OOPS, my bad! I looked at the EZ-Nec plot on my antennas, and the take-off angle is 22 degrees, not 26 as stated in mt previous post. Getting old is.... Well you know. 73, Mike, W5UC *If you voted fo
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-10/msg00223.html (6,593 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu