Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w5ps@airmail.net: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

21. TopBand: 9M0C, Heard well, but that all (score: 1)
Author: w5ps@airmail.net (Peter Sears)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 1998 07:43:49 -0600
I heard 9M0C from 12:56 till 13:31Z this morning. They were Q5 copy from 13:10 till 13:27Z. The only signals who caught their attention were 6's and 7's. Congrats to W7TVF! Has anyone tried them at 1
/archives//html/Topband/1998-02/msg00164.html (6,670 bytes)

22. TopBand: 9M0C in the log!!!! (score: 1)
Author: w5ps@airmail.net (Peter Sears)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 1998 07:12:15 -0600
What a smile on my face after finally working the 9M0C for number 214! Peter W5PS North Texas -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html Submissions: topband@contesting.com Administrative
/archives//html/Topband/1998-02/msg00249.html (6,378 bytes)

23. Re: Topband: Strange conditions Sunday night (score: 1)
Author: Peter Sears <w5ps@airmail.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 17:01:45 -0600
From here in the southwest it was one of the best nights going into Europe and the Middle East. The surprising part was when you work a 4X4 or a SV3 you usually get a whole bunch of callers from the
/archives//html/Topband/2004-02/msg00136.html (8,952 bytes)

24. Re: Topband: 3B9C In Florida/ Receive Antennas (score: 1)
Author: Peter Sears <w5ps@airmail.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:15:50 -0600
Tom, yes I would put up some receive antenna's but open up the TX antenna during receive with a simple relay at the base of the transmit antenna. This will remove the coupling. Peter Thomas Giella KN
/archives//html/Topband/2004-03/msg00259.html (9,888 bytes)

25. Re: Topband: New High-Performance Beverage Pre-amp (score: 1)
Author: Peter Sears <w5ps@airmail.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 14:57:23 -0500
Rick, the 1dB compression spec is P1dB or Pout at 1dB gain compression. This is an output power spec not input power. So the input power at P1dB= +15dBm is -4dBm or 19dB less than the output power at
/archives//html/Topband/2004-04/msg00108.html (8,427 bytes)

26. Re: Topband: Tophat? Does it have to be at the top? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Sears <w5ps@airmail.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 22:13:20 -0500
Back 15yrs ago when I first installed my 130' rotating tower I first put up a 4 element 20M beam at 60'. I installed a shunt feed 2' away from the tower and the tap at 58'. This tuned very easily wit
/archives//html/Topband/2004-06/msg00031.html (11,622 bytes)

27. Re: Topband: Shunt feeding the rotating tower (score: 1)
Author: Peter Sears <w5ps@airmail.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 09:39:05 -0500
Juhani, I have a 130' rotating tower with essentially the same setup. I have 2 element 40M at 130', 4 element 20M at 121', guy bearing at 120', guy bearing at 90'. another 4 element 20M at 61' and ro
/archives//html/Topband/2004-10/msg00048.html (8,280 bytes)

28. Re: Topband: Better low band conditions?, (score: 1)
Author: Peter Sears <w5ps@airmail.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:58:33 -0800
I think the exception to every comment on this thread is the king (in my opinion) VE1ZZ. I have heard him work inaudiable stations to the east when I lived in NJ as WB2ULI and to the Pacafic/Asia as
/archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00176.html (7,067 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu