Mail Archive Search: <+from:w2pm@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:w2pm@aol.com: 320 ]

Total 320 documents matching your query.

41. TopBand: ARRL 160 at OT7T - ON4UN (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm); Date: Mon, 8 Dec 1997 07:26:18 EST; << Our autorities have been visiting the site, and will be back in about a week with specilists (university professor etc) to make an evaluation and prescribe the necessary action. Authorities and ex; /archives//html/Topband/1997-12/msg00131.html (7,014 bytes)
42. TopBand: stratwarm?? (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm); Date: Tue, 23 Dec 1997 14:19:56 EST; Last year or so I asked Dr. George Jacobs - W3ASK - the propagation man from CQ magazine for 40 years about whether Stratwarm really meant anything. His initial email to me (as well as Dean Straws fr; /archives//html/Topband/1997-12/msg00282.html (7,215 bytes)
43. TopBand: radial debate add-ons (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm); Date: Tue, 30 Dec 1997 07:17:08 EST; << My question is this, Since I have no radials on my antenna system, and I have a very broarbanded low SWR will radials "enhance" or improve the performance of said antenna? >> The "broadbanded low; /archives//html/Topband/1997-12/msg00387.html (7,046 bytes)
44. TopBand: annoying 800 hz tone on 1840 (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Thu, 13 Nov 1997 08:23:52 -0500 (EST); W2JPW here in NNJ has a similar problem which he traced to a power company distribution yard which is (very sadly for him) less than 1/2 mile away. He followed the noise on a portable SW receiver and; /archives//html/Topband/1997-11/msg00176.html (7,198 bytes)
45. TopBand: Skewed propagation, TX RX angles (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Thu, 13 Nov 1997 08:53:43 -0500 (EST); In regard to the various theories about skewing on 160 I wonder (and actually suspect) that the phenomena may be due to multiple propgation modes which is very common on the higher bands. Thats what; /archives//html/Topband/1997-11/msg00177.html (8,891 bytes)
46. TopBand: UA1 /FJL (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 06:10:31 -0500 (EST); << I haven't seen it reported, but RX1OX/FJL was on 1834 abt 2300 last night - QSL via DL6YET. he was abt 579 with some QSB. I don't know if he is genuine, but if so, that's a nice one for any band.; /archives//html/Topband/1997-11/msg00275.html (6,952 bytes)
47. TopBand: More on vertical vs dipole (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Mon, 20 Oct 1997 18:58:55 -0400 (EDT); << I've been wondering whether it's possible that at certain times it's just necessary to have high angle radiation, irrespective of the ground losses in or just outside the near field. Is it possibl; /archives//html/Topband/1997-10/msg00291.html (8,714 bytes)
48. TopBand: Slanderous comments (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1997 06:33:14 -0500 (EST); OM's: I cannot help but write this post to say this reflector contains a wealth of great operational and technical information and there are LOTS of great guys here BUT there is also an abundance of; /archives//html/Topband/1997-10/msg00439.html (7,017 bytes)
49. TopBand: dipole/vert (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 08:05:43 -0500 (EST); << hat price reciprocity? (in the ionosphere, that is) >> Another case of different SN ratios at different QTHS .. 73 Pete -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html Submissions: topband@c; /archives//html/Topband/1997-10/msg00458.html (6,770 bytes)
50. TopBand: Dip/Vert Test Results (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 08:16:13 -0500 (EST); I think comparing antennas performance can be extremely misleading since there are SO many variables at either end - thats why antenna test ranges are so complex. One of the obvious pitfalls of compa; /archives//html/Topband/1997-10/msg00459.html (7,836 bytes)
51. TopBand: Top-Band(ung) Report (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 16:55:15 -0400 (EDT); << The condx are getting better.... With an A-index below 10 some very brief, but good openings are possible to Westcoast >> A few of us out East US - NYC area have noticed propagation seems enhanced; /archives//html/Topband/1997-09/msg00127.html (7,305 bytes)
52. TopBand: 160 Propagation and NOAA/WWV indices (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Tue, 16 Sep 1997 08:16:22 -0400 (EDT); You can tell I dont operate 20 and dont have directional antennas by my remarks about the W2 - JA path be "sub-auroral". Some replies pointed that out and I looked once again at my now former trusty; /archives//html/Topband/1997-09/msg00135.html (7,293 bytes)
53. TopBand: Boring Report- DF2PY (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 17:13:44 -0400 (EDT); << Although the band conditions have improved the city noise and a neighbors SVGA monitor made it impossible to copy. >> I have found an excellent remedy to this an most other "man-made" (or person-m; /archives//html/Topband/1997-09/msg00265.html (7,247 bytes)
54. TopBand: ANC-4 (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 14:54:15 -0400 (EDT); Tree et al .. Re the ANC-4 I has a few messages from people saying they didnt have much success on 160 with them and since I was having the opposite experience I started playing ... First, the sense; /archives//html/Topband/1997-09/msg00351.html (7,596 bytes)
55. TopBand: ANC-4 questions (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 15:46:09 -0400 (EDT); I doubt the nullers would be effective as they need a relatively constant fixed phase and amplitude to work. 73 Pete W2PM - -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html Submissions: topband@; /archives//html/Topband/1997-09/msg00366.html (6,743 bytes)
56. Fwd: TopBand: Slinky / SCIENCE (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Wed, 6 Aug 1997 11:54:34 -0400 (EDT); reply fwd message -- Forwarded message: Subj: Re: TopBand: Slinky / SCIENCE To: <topband@contesting.com> Date: 97-08-06 07:50:02 EDT From: W2pm To: ni6t@best.com I hope all of you wont ever walk the; /archives//html/Topband/1997-08/msg00029.html (9,005 bytes)
57. Fwd: TopBand: ground losses (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Thu, 14 Aug 1997 16:58:01 -0400 (EDT); to list -- Forwarded message: Subj: Re: TopBand: ground losses To: <topband@contesting.com> Date: 97-08-14 13:01:56 EDT From: W2pm To: jhenders@tdrss.wsc.nasa.gov << Considering the current thread of; /archives//html/Topband/1997-08/msg00084.html (7,956 bytes)
58. TopBand: ground losses (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Sat, 16 Aug 1997 18:59:39 -0400 (EDT); One of the simplest and most effective things to do hasnt been mentioned much with everyone talking about standard Marconi type verticals ... I have found that getting the current node UP IN THE AIR; /archives//html/Topband/1997-08/msg00106.html (7,499 bytes)
59. TopBand: FCC NPRM to Peempt Local Zoning for B/C Stations (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Tue, 26 Aug 1997 18:23:59 -0400 (EDT); This may be worth replying to as well as advising your local ARRL director for the reason that HDTV has taken a big step BACKWARD in the last few weeks with the announcements by ABC and a smaller gro; /archives//html/Topband/1997-08/msg00164.html (7,852 bytes)
60. TopBand: Slinky Beverage (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 09:07:07 -0400 (EDT); I am brand-new to the topband reflector so please excuse this if this subject was recently covered. Does anyone have any experience with a slinky beverage? Several local DXer;s here report good resul; /archives//html/Topband/1997-07/msg00144.html (7,670 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]