Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ve5ra@sasktel.net: 149 ]

Total 149 documents matching your query.

41. Re: Topband: Patience in ARRL 160 Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 07:51:34 -0600
When a cw station asks for a fill I send my COMPLETE callsign. Why? a) My memory keyer or logging program has my full callsign, no partial callsign. I don't use the hand keyer just in case I have 'de
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00120.html (11,340 bytes)

42. Re: Topband: one- way propagation (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 19:14:31 -0600
Nope, Nope. I am a firm believer in one-way propagation on 160m, having witnessed it many times. Let me give you a recent example. In the last weekends contest I worked LY7M. We both run decent stati
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00142.html (8,564 bytes)

43. Re: Topband: Patience in ARRL 160 Contest -- copying weak ones (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 11:45:38 -0600
George, IMO you have solved the problem ... mental. Your last sentence describes the condition exactly ... your brain goes blank or slows as a defence mechanism from all the noise/signals on the band
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00175.html (15,580 bytes)

44. Re: Topband: Patience in ARRL 160 Contest -- copying weak ones (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 14:18:43 -0600
Thanks Herb, That certainly removes the operator condition from the explanation. It will be interesting to discover why the transmissions tail off. Is it repeatable? For example if the same station k
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00187.html (18,407 bytes)

45. Re: Topband: GAP VERTICAL QUESTION (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:47:47 -0600
The GAP Voyager is not much better than a dummy load on 160m. On 80m and 40m it received fairly well compared to my other 80 and 40 antennas. Doug Original Message-- With the prospect of downsizing a
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00314.html (8,639 bytes)

46. Re: Topband: GAP Vertical Question (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 08:36:59 -0600
How long did the KLM last before the light boom folded, or the element to boom brackets failed or the linear loaded insulator let go? One good wind storm? Doug "Think of all the ways you can hurt you
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00432.html (8,182 bytes)

47. Re: Topband: A 160 Meter antenne puzzle (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 17:19:58 -0600
Hi, Is it really necessary to isolate the vertical from the pressure treated 4 x 4 with PVC tubing and is it really necessary to install a 1:1 balun between the antenna and feedline in this 4-square
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00063.html (8,955 bytes)

48. Re: Topband: Measured RG-6 Loss: Solid Copper vs. Copper Clad center conductor (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 10:48:25 -0600
I successfully use 100s and 100s of feet of copper clad steel RG-6 in my 160m 4-square receive setup with a pre-amp at the station. Copper clad steel works for me. Doug "Think of all the ways you can
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00177.html (9,204 bytes)

49. Re: Topband: Tree losses.... (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 18:04:32 -0600
The only way to say which location is better is to do a side by side comparison which didn't happen. You are making assumptions which may be wrong or may be right. Blaming it on trees is a guess. The
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00087.html (6,788 bytes)

50. Re: Topband: Idiom Press (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 21:40:22 -0600
I checked my email records and see the same story back in year 2008. Some things never change. I hope this time Rob gets his act together for good. Doug "Think of all the ways you can hurt yourself l
/archives//html/Topband/2013-10/msg00194.html (8,238 bytes)

51. Topband: K9W on Top BAnd (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 09:57:11 -0600
Yes K9W had an excellent, easy to work, signal into Saskatchewan this morning. Doug "Think of all the ways you can hurt yourself laughing." --Original Message-- Good signal tonight http://youtu.be/5t
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00103.html (6,873 bytes)

52. Re: Topband: Don't give up AND log who worked the DX b4 and after! (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:42:09 -0600
Good that they followed Martti's one-off rule. Some don't (JAXXX). It's refreshing to hear stories of this nature. "Think of all the ways you can hurt yourself laughing." --Original Message-- JUST re
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00214.html (9,079 bytes)

53. Re: Topband: Don't give up AND log who worked the DX b4 and after! (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:52:12 -0600
I learned a lesson many years ago where I showed up on a needed band as a NIL. I have more than one callsign and if I need that band contact I will try and work them with both callsigns now. Mistakes
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00215.html (8,543 bytes)

54. Re: Topband: S21 (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 13:23:22 -0600
Same here on 80m from VE5. Good signal, listening for NA only, but copying very, very few. Doug "Think of all the ways you can hurt yourself laughing." --Original Message-- Very nice signals from S21
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00285.html (7,044 bytes)

55. Re: Topband: 160M Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2013 15:04:51 -0600
Sam you had no trouble working me on the first call. Doug/VA5DX "Think of all the ways you can hurt yourself laughing." --Original Message-- Worked AZ (N7GP). Very easy! Randy K5ZD said VFB signal :)
/archives//html/Topband/2013-12/msg00064.html (8,748 bytes)

56. Re: Topband: Anyone purchased the ARRL book on Short Antennasfor160??? (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 14:24:58 -0600
I posted this on TowerTalk and I got a couple of responses as to why the ends of ground radials should not be grounded. However no-one has guessed as to how many db I have supposedly lost with the be
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00248.html (14,153 bytes)

57. Re: Topband: Grounding the ends of radials (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 16:32:02 -0600
If I lay my 1/4 wavelength bare radials several inches below ground; is that not the same as if the radials were grounded along their length? Doug --Original Message-- True, I expect, Carl. Just don'
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00253.html (10,508 bytes)

58. Topband: NH0Z on Topband (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 11:20:10 -0600
NH0Z appeared this morning partially covered by a west coast cq er. He wasn't strong but could hear well. Doug "Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deser
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00272.html (6,569 bytes)

59. Re: Topband: FT5ZM (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 08:52:54 -0600
I will have to get up earlier. At your time the only good DX here was NH0Z and V63DX. Doug "Think of all the ways you can hurt yourself laughing." --Original Message-- He was first discernable here a
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00288.html (7,482 bytes)

60. Re: Topband: Short receiving verticals question (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 09:04:02 -0600
I have used this same setup for my 4-square 160m receive array for years. Since I have to take down and put up this array every spring/fall, I have to re-tune each element for the 160m band. I have f
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00346.html (10,414 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu