Mail Archive Search: <+from:topband-bounces@contesting.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:topband-bounces@contesting.com: 82 ]

Total 82 documents matching your query.

1. RE: Topband: hugh signals from europe! (score: 1): Author: topband-bounces@contesting.com (by way of Bill Tippett<btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 07:21:11 -0500; Return-Path: <oz1ing@mail.dk> From: "Henrik Weiss" <oz1ing@mail.dk> To: <topband@contesting.com> Subject: RE: Topband: hugh signals from europe! Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 13:01:03 +0100 Great Friday morn; /archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00118.html (7,522 bytes)
2. Topband: Forward of moderated message (score: 1): Author: topband-bounces@contesting.com (by way of Bill Tippett<btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 11:15:07 -0500; I have had contact with Dan, N1ND, the ARRL contest manager. Dan's interpretation of the rules, as they arte written now (and have been unchanged for many, many years) is that KP4, KV4, KL and KH wor; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00061.html (8,008 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: TRANSFORMER QUESTION (score: 1): Author: topband-bounces@contesting.com (by way of Bill Tippett<btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 17:48:08 -0500; Bill, If you are using the autoformer (single winding with a tap) design from Tom's web site, I'm not surprised to hear about the limited high frequency response. Autoformers are not particularly bro; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00086.html (7,307 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Carrier on 1820.4 (score: 1): Author: topband-bounces@contesting.com (by way of Bill Tippett<btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 19:35:53 -0500; Barry, I am not sure, but something like that is readable S4 even here in EU > north part of Czech Reoublic around that frequency. Should be some different source but would like to report You... Does; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00091.html (7,055 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: ZL Beacon/Digi ? (score: 1): Author: topband-bounces@contesting.com (by way of Bill Tippett<btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 06:28:46 -0500; Hello Steve The beacon concerned is a commercial radionavigation beacon located at the lower end of the North Island, on Tinakori Hill in Wellington city. I have been told that the beacon provides a; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00141.html (7,834 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: Carrier on 1820.4 (score: 1): Author: topband-bounces@contesting.com (by way of Bill Tippett<btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 13:47:00 -0500; OOPS! I'm the culprit. I put a test signal on to check out my Orion at 5 watts into what I thought was a dummy load and it was in the antenna. Sorry es 73, Jerry K0TV FN42hr _________________________; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00150.html (7,913 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: Dirty Harry and the DX window (score: 1): Author: topband-bounces@contesting.com (by way of Bill Tippett<btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 07:53:02 -0500; We all know that if You want to absolutely win a Contest (a pure nonsense in my opinion) You have to move where geographical/propagation conditions maximize scores, obtaining the best benefit by cont; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00170.html (9,647 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: "Magnetic Receiving Loop / small loop , brief summary. (score: 1): Author: topband-bounces@contesting.com (by way of Bill Tippett<btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 12:51:23 -0500; Tom: Apparently some people desperately want to hear: "yes this small so called magnetic loop is as good as Tom's phased Beverage's, or John's (K9DX) 9-circle", and "yes you can do it all from 1/2 ac; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00278.html (8,020 bytes)
9. Re: Topband: "Magnetic Receiving Loop / small loop , brief summary. (score: 1): Author: topband-bounces@contesting.com (by way of Bill Tippett<btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 21:59:43 -0500; See ON4UN's book, edition 4, page 11-63... You will find all the detials (also 6 circle, 7 circle and 9 circle...) 73 John, ON4UN _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00291.html (7,191 bytes)
10. Re: Topband: Loop antennas (score: 1): Author: topband-bounces@contesting.com (by way of Bill Tippett<btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 06:23:54 -0500; On 160 you hardly, if ever, need gain (take de isotropic antenna as a reference). As I thought I explained in great detail in the last issue of my book (edition4), receiving on top band is a question; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00297.html (10,706 bytes)
11. Re: Topband: "Magnetic Receiving Loop / small loop , brief summary. (score: 1): Author: topband-bounces@contesting.com (by way of Bill Tippett<btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 10:32:51 -0500; Most hams have the ability to work 160 meters these days because the rigs include this band and the demise of Loran A. I have friends who want to get started on 160 or HF operation in general and ask; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00300.html (9,291 bytes)
12. Re: Topband: Morning EU (score: 1): Author: topband-bounces@contesting.com (by way of Bill Tippett<btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:56:22 -0500; Larry, Normal "long path" from here is SW. But normal has a significant standard deviation, just like short path does here. Today RAWLW was coming from West. OH3XR was from SW with no trace anywhere; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00384.html (8,328 bytes)
13. Re: Topband: Morning EU (score: 1): Author: topband-bounces@contesting.com (by way of Bill Tippett<btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:57:27 -0500; Herb, One word: Aurora. Bob, N7UA _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00385.html (7,616 bytes)
14. Re: Topband: Noise ID (score: 1): Author: topband-bounces@contesting.com (by way of Bill Tippett<btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2006 15:20:38 -0500; Tree, I agree it is an electric fence. It may be the old style. But I have heard the new ones sound exactly like that if they are shorted to ground somewhere along the length. The new ones are design; /archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00006.html (7,673 bytes)
15. Re: Topband: HB0/DL2OBO QRV from 2. - 7.January 2006 (score: 1): Author: topband-bounces@contesting.com (by way of Bill Tippett<btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 15:03:22 -0500; hello Aki, I have just received a telephone call from Tom... he has no access to the web, but he has received Bill's message and will be QRV for JA today and tomorrow (he will have to return home on; /archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00095.html (7,912 bytes)
16. Re: Topband: Vertical construction (score: 1): Author: topband-bounces@contesting.com (by way of Bill Tippett<btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 06:00:50 -0500; For what its worth -- I constructed my verticals using 5", 0.050" wall irrigation tubing, from top to bottom. The verticals are 140 feet high. The top section is 120 feet, made from three 40' lengths; /archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00108.html (11,065 bytes)
17. Re: Topband: Condx to Arizona (score: 1): Author: topband-bounces@contesting.com (by way of Bill Tippett<btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:53:40 -0500; Hi All! True, very nice conditions to west USA this morning. I worked two stations from Arizona N8GZ and AB7E both 579, and I worked N7JW sounding like a local station. Unfortunately I had to go I wa; /archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00290.html (7,439 bytes)
18. Re: Topband: Noise cancelling (score: 1): Author: topband-bounces@contesting.com (by way of Bill Tippett<btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:46:57 -0500; Hi topbanders, noise cancelling by just computing the difference between the frequency of a signal with noise and a neighboring frequency with noise only will not work if the noise is of statistical; /archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00297.html (7,175 bytes)
19. Re: Topband: Calling without hearing (was CQ 160 WW) (score: 1): Author: topband-bounces@contesting.com (by way of Bill Tippett<btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:30:44 -0500; Tom and others, I am a beginner on Top band reflector so maybe I've no rights to talk so much over there, but in this case maybe I have some solution reducing the problem... ...not calling CQ DX at a; /archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00438.html (9,361 bytes)
20. Re: Topband: CQ 160 WW (score: 1): Author: topband-bounces@contesting.com (by way of Bill Tippett<btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:58:35 -0500; Only a part-time participant, I heard plenty of DX calling under stateside CQ machines. I worked a few of them but the confusion that gets created gives me a headache. On topband, a "balanced" system; /archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00446.html (8,766 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]