Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:topband@planet3.freeuk.co.uk: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: FT8 qrm (score: 1)
Author: Brian D G3VGZ <topband@planet3.freeuk.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:04:03 +0000
I shall be operating this weekend full legal limit *below* 1837.5 CW, and also FT*/JT65/JT9 at up to the legal limit above 1838. There's no reason both can't co-exist. It should be a rule in contests
/archives//html/Topband/2017-11/msg00187.html (10,211 bytes)

22. Re: Topband: qro across 160m band during contests (score: 1)
Author: Brian D G3VGZ <topband@planet3.freeuk.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 23:20:54 +0000
I also noticed no difference in this weekend's contest. However in the recent RSGB contest I saw a reduction above 1850. After a contest a couple of years ago when all europe appeared to be very QRO
/archives//html/Topband/2018-02/msg00194.html (8,250 bytes)

23. Re: Topband: 2019 STEW PERRY (score: 1)
Author: Brian D G3VGZ <topband@planet3.freeuk.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 02:32:12 +0000
I worked him in the SP (With difficulty) at 1643z so much too early for USA into UK, perhaps he's using more than one site? wrote: -- Brian D G3VGZ _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.c
/archives//html/Topband/2019-12/msg00249.html (10,018 bytes)

24. Topband: FST4 (score: 1)
Author: Brian D G3VGZ <topband@planet3.freeuk.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 00:38:49 +0000
Anyone using this mode? -- Brian D G3VGZ _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2021-02/msg00013.html (6,039 bytes)

25. Re: Topband: FST4 (score: 1)
Author: Brian D G3VGZ <topband@planet3.freeuk.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 17:10:51 +0000
I called cq for about half an hour around 0000z last night on 1839 + 930 to keep clear of FT8. 500w to inefficient ant. No takers and no reports from PSKReporter. Plenty of FT8 about though. may try
/archives//html/Topband/2021-02/msg00020.html (8,690 bytes)

26. Re: Topband: PSK31 etc (score: 1)
Author: Brian D G3VGZ <topband@planet3.freeuk.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 16:28:24 +0000
Would it not make sense to move the QRP frequencies to above 1850 kHz into the low power (for most of Europe) part of the band? -- Brian D G3VGZ _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.cont
/archives//html/Topband/2022-02/msg00128.html (7,360 bytes)

27. Re: Topband: Radials, EZNEC and far field (score: 1)
Author: Brian D G3VGZ <topband@planet3.freeuk.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 01:17:39 +0000
One other situation, above large quantities of dry ice, Antarctica or perhaps Greenland. -- Brian D G3VGZ _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2022-12/msg00087.html (7,738 bytes)

28. Re: Topband: Using 4 - 6 elevated radials in lieu of 120 buried wires (score: 1)
Author: Brian D G3VGZ <topband@planet3.freeuk.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2024 01:50:16 +0000
At an MF broadcast station station I worked at 50+ years ago a qsy of 200KHz HF had been made. Severe fading was then encountered at the edge of the service area at night from a high skylobe. About 2
/archives//html/Topband/2024-01/msg00057.html (10,683 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 28
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu