- 1. Re: Topband: high take-off angle (score: 1)
- Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@bdtv.se>
- Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 17:15:02 +0200
- _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
- /archives//html/Topband/2011-10/msg00102.html (7,392 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: high take-off angle (score: 1)
- Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@bdtv.se>
- Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 06:49:50 +0200
- Yes well I might explain my statement a little. First of all I have read all the books by ON4UN and also this by NM7M together with lots of other writeups etc etc. I am NOT saying that thats not true
- /archives//html/Topband/2011-10/msg00117.html (10,514 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: QRP Question (score: 1)
- Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@bdtv.se>
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 06:21:54 +0100
- This is so wrong. Please please stop spreading this wrong stuff. It is a mobile designator and NO nothing else. _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
- /archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00296.html (9,195 bytes)
- 4. Re: Topband: QRP Question (score: 1)
- Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@bdtv.se>
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 06:39:40 +0100
- Thank you very much Martin, I couldnīt have put i better myself. And as an advice, if some QRP station wants to work me donīt even try once with /qrp mickey mouse stuff, there will be no QSO. _______
- /archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00300.html (10,769 bytes)
- 5. Re: Topband: QRP Question (score: 1)
- Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@bdtv.se>
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 21:52:23 +0100
- Yes really. FCC does not rule the world and in this case FCC is wrong. Country designator is put before the callsign. This changed way back in the 1970īties Not to confuse things if I go to England a
- /archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00323.html (11,259 bytes)
- 6. Re: Topband: HFTA, Radio Arcala, general comments (score: 1)
- Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@bdtv.se>
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 07:09:31 +0200
- Iīve tried to inquire how it works but it has been awfully silent from that direction. I can tell one story, no science in this but for whatever itīs worth. During a CQWW CW 160 contest I was sitting
- /archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00358.html (9,906 bytes)
- 7. Re: Topband: Being there; was Re: Need help to improve DX on 1/2 acre lot from CA (score: 1)
- Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@bdtv.se>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 08:00:38 +0100
- Rick, your 100W also made it into my log back in 2010 31 January. Nice with 100W. This was when I had a good antenna that is no more. On 1/13/2013 8:52 AM, Jim Brown wrote: On 1/12/2013 12:49 PM, k7x
- /archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00131.html (10,297 bytes)
- 8. Re: Topband: topband report from 4V1JB (score: 1)
- Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@bdtv.se>
- Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2014 09:56:25 +0100
- I called you for 45 minutes or so, also a lot of other EU stations called, you did have a decent signal but problems receiving. Wow 20 over 9 noise floor, if I had known I never would have called you
- /archives//html/Topband/2014-12/msg00054.html (10,324 bytes)
- 9. Re: Topband: Out-of-Turn Callers (score: 1)
- Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@bdtv.se>
- Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 07:51:32 +0100
- Sorry if Iīm a PITA right now but why even bother to have this debate about K1N on 160, itīs not even DX to NA, like a local station almost. Jeez how difficult can it be from the US, anybody with 100
- /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00148.html (10,117 bytes)
- 10. Re: Topband: Out-of-Turn Callers (score: 1)
- Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@bdtv.se>
- Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 09:00:45 +0100
- On 2015-02-05 08:30, Jim Brown wrote: On Wed,2/4/2015 10:51 PM, Jan Erik Holm wrote: Sorry if Iīm a PITA right now but why even bother to have this debate about K1N on 160, itīs not even DX to NA, li
- /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00150.html (10,271 bytes)
- 11. Re: Topband: K5P in Zone 14 (score: 1)
- Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@bdtv.se>
- Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 07:48:23 +0100
- Yesterday to my big surprise I could copy K5P on 160m for about 30 minutes, seemed to peak around 1445Z. They where as strong as 559 on the peaks with deep QSB. I never ever was thinking it was possi
- /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00457.html (8,905 bytes)
- 12. Re: Topband: FT-8 (score: 1)
- Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@bdtv.se>
- Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 15:03:03 +0100
- I hope that he was right. 73 Jim SM2EKM -- On 2019-02-01 05:18, K9FD wrote: Aloha Len, Remember those QSOs, very rare SSB contact as I dont work SSB, but your signal was loud so I gave it a try. Goo
- /archives//html/Topband/2019-02/msg00005.html (11,689 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu