Mail Archive Search: <+from:n6wg@comcast.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:n6wg@comcast.net: 38 ]

Total 38 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: Beverage grounding over rock (score: 1): Author: "Bob Tellefsen" <n6wg@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 09:12:50 -0800; Dave Can you possible dig a 1 ft deep trench in that ground and lay your ground rod in on its side? This does work in some circumstances, probably where the soil itself has reasonable conductivity. 7; /archives//html/Topband/2004-12/msg00037.html (7,337 bytes)
22. Re: Topband: Short Receive Antennas (score: 1): Author: "Bob Tellefsen" <n6wg@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 09:11:23 -0800; Kevin Go to this site for info on the Flag and Pennant receive antennas. They really work. http://www.angelfire.com/md/k3ky/page37.html Also, try searching on K9AY LOOP. This one is also quite effect; /archives//html/Topband/2004-12/msg00135.html (7,300 bytes)
23. Re: Topband: Short Receive Antennas (score: 1): Author: "Bob Tellefsen" <n6wg@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:01:10 -0800; Jerry I have the MFJ1025. I don't use it now, but it really does work well under the right conditions. You need the right antennas in the right locations to feed it, but when everything is just right; /archives//html/Topband/2004-12/msg00193.html (9,009 bytes)
24. Topband: Stew Perry hours (score: 1): Author: "Bob Tellefsen" <n6wg@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 19:00:01 -0800; I'm trying to figure out whether to pull an all-nighter on this one. Is there enough activity between midnight PST (0800 UTC) to about 3AM (1100 UTC) to make it worth while staying up? In the past I'; /archives//html/Topband/2004-12/msg00200.html (6,460 bytes)
25. Re: Topband: Noise blanker fun (score: 1): Author: "Bob Tellefsen" <n6wg@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 11:16:08 -0800; Hi Tree Here's something you might try in your noise blanker experiments. When I worked at Motorola, I noticed that the receivers with blankers had some extra delay time built into the signal path. T; /archives//html/Topband/2004-12/msg00270.html (7,025 bytes)
26. Re: Topband: New Antenna (score: 1): Author: "Bob Tellefsen" <n6wg@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 09:20:41 -0800; Warren This may run counter to other suggestions you will receive, but here goes. Use the flag pole to support the vertical leg of an inverted L, and the tower to support the far end. This will give; /archives//html/Topband/2004-12/msg00317.html (7,829 bytes)
27. Re: Topband: Questions regarding RX Antennas (score: 1): Author: "Bob Tellefsen" <n6wg@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 10:31:20 -0800; Scott You have several options available to you, depending on how much real estate you have to work with. The ideal would be a series of Beverages, but few of us have the room this takes. The K9AY lo; /archives//html/Topband/2004-12/msg00321.html (7,598 bytes)
28. Re: Topband: The Forbidden Frequency (score: 1): Author: "Bob Tellefsen" <n6wg@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 14:11:54 -0800; Charles There is another possibility, at least mathematically. That is A+B=C, in this case 1830 kHz. For example 610 + 1220 = 1830. This is a classic intermod product. It would require both sources t; /archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00018.html (7,475 bytes)
29. Topband: JA on 160m (score: 1): Author: "Robert Tellefsen" <n6wg@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:10:19 -0800; I'm going to try working the JIDX contest in April. Can anyone tell me what are the more probable times to work JA from the San Francisco area? Evening, middle of the night, early morning? Just tryin; /archives//html/Topband/2005-02/msg00241.html (6,378 bytes)
30. Re: Topband: My JA on 160 questin (score: 1): Author: "Robert Tellefsen" <n6wg@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:54:23 -0800; Looks like I should have read the "fine print" more closely. There is no 160m operation during the JIDX contest. ES5QX and N6IZ caught that and called it to my attention. Thanks, fellows. I would hav; /archives//html/Topband/2005-02/msg00248.html (6,958 bytes)
31. Topband: Better low band conditions? (score: 1): Author: "Robert Tellefsen" <n6wg@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:51:42 -0800; I'm still trying to figure out whether the anticipated improvement in low band conditions will be due to improved propagation, or just the appearance of same due to more stations being crowded down i; /archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00162.html (6,521 bytes)
32. Re: Topband: Better low band conditions? (score: 1): Author: "Robert Tellefsen" <n6wg@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 16:19:42 -0800; "As a matter of fact, I think they are worse now then they were around 2000. 73 Tom" That's sort of what prompted me to raise the question. Now, with better antennas and several more years experience; /archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00177.html (8,084 bytes)
33. Re: Topband: One Vertical vs. Another (score: 1): Author: "Robert Tellefsen" <n6wg@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 08:58:19 -0800; Bob My suggestion would be to remove about the bottom 10 to 15 feet of the proposed vertical and insert some insulated support. This will place the feedpoint and the radiating portion of the vertical; /archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00190.html (7,304 bytes)
34. Re: Topband: Support for Flags? (score: 1): Author: "Robert Tellefsen" <n6wg@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 08:46:52 -0700; Eric I'm using metal masts for my 160m Flag here. The one at the rear is steel, and the one at the front is aluminum. Both masts are about 10-15 ft from the vertical wires of the Flag. Farther is bet; /archives//html/Topband/2005-06/msg00008.html (8,306 bytes)
35. Re: Topband: As for me and my station we will run QRP in the Stew Perry (score: 1): Author: "Bob Tellefsen" <n6wg@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:52:10 -0700; Way to go, Larry. Hope we can QSO in the SP. 73, Bob N6WG The Little Station with Attitude The SP is the only contest where you can feel a real accomplishment running QRP There is an immediate gratif; /archives//html/Topband/2009-10/msg00400.html (8,320 bytes)
36. [Trlog] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: n6wg@comcast.net; Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:29:16 +0000 (UTC); http://lejca.eu.org/default.php _______________________________________________ Trlog mailing list Trlog@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/trlog; /archives//html/Topband/2010-07/msg00057.html (6,397 bytes)
37. [Trlog] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: n6wg@comcast.net; Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 08:40:33 +0000 (UTC); http://electroniques.us/default.php _______________________________________________ Trlog mailing list Trlog@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/trlog; /archives//html/Topband/2010-07/msg00081.html (6,715 bytes)
38. [Trlog] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: n6wg@comcast.net; Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 07:01:02 +0000 (UTC); http://lejca.eu.org/default.php _______________________________________________ Trlog mailing list Trlog@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/trlog; /archives//html/Topband/2010-07/msg00084.html (6,817 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 38
Page: [1] [2]