Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n4cc@windstream.net: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: Blame it on global warming (score: 1)
Author: <n4cc@windstream.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 10:57:00 -0400
It's very disputable...but I agree politics should be kept off the reflector. 73, Greg-N4CC _________________ Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00034.html (10,292 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Verifying integrity of 75 ohm coax. (score: 1)
Author: Greg-N4CC <n4cc@windstream.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 09:23:43 -0700
Silicone is totally different from silica.  Silica in its most common form is "sand".  Silicone is a name for a class of compounds based on the element silicon.  The properties can vary significantly
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00343.html (10,177 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: K3 & some interesting noise lessons in the ARRL 160. (score: 1)
Author: "Greg" <n4cc@windstream.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 04:29:58 -0700
Why would the NB null be frequency dependent? Why does it change? Why would a different antenna make any difference unless you pick up different noise sources with the two different antennas? 73, Gre
/archives//html/Topband/2013-12/msg00168.html (10,169 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Teflon Tubing (score: 1)
Author: Greg Wilson <n4cc@windstream.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 07:06:09 -0600
Why not suggest the alternative postal method to Price (W0RI) instead of making a "ridiculous" issue out of this on the reflector., I know him personally and he doesn't need the money. He was just tr
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00172.html (9,683 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Rig Question (score: 1)
Author: "Greg" <n4cc@windstream.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 14:35:55 -0600
Why not just get a K3 instead of something that "rivals" it. It's made in the USA, too, and Elecraft has the best customer service in the industry. I have no affiliation with Elecraft -- just a satis
/archives//html/Topband/2014-06/msg00098.html (7,697 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Rig Question (score: 1)
Author: "Greg" <n4cc@windstream.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 13:55:37 -0600
I have a friend who doesn't like the K3 because of the SSB audio...said he likes his FT1000D much better. I happen to have a FT1000D in the shack so I tuned both receivers to the same station with bo
/archives//html/Topband/2014-06/msg00113.html (9,960 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Rig Question (score: 1)
Author: "Greg" <n4cc@windstream.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 15:22:22 -0600
Sorry my original post was not clear...What I meant was that my friend didn't like the receive audio on the K3 when listening to a SSB signal...the transmitted signal was not the issue. Sorry for the
/archives//html/Topband/2014-06/msg00118.html (11,064 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Ferrite Cores (score: 1)
Author: "Greg" <n4cc@windstream.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 08:46:54 -0600
The Mouser part picture does not look like a FT-240-31. The referenced part number looks like it fits over a cable. Hmm, $3 each more than Mouser who also is a very fast shipper, usually same day. Mo
/archives//html/Topband/2014-08/msg00031.html (9,537 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Out-of-Turn Callers (score: 1)
Author: Greg Wilson <n4cc@windstream.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 16:01:26 -0500
Can't resist adding my two cents...It's not up to KK6ZM to decide that K1N is not hearing JA's and so decide that it is OK to call; that just creates confusion and animosity from those who have the w
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00040.html (11,852 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: [Bulk] Re: Out-of-Turn Callers (score: 1)
Author: Greg Wilson <n4cc@windstream.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 09:37:31 -0500
I doubt making a whipping boy out of someone in public will have any effect on the other 250,000 people who have done it at least once. The point is not to make a whipping boy out of a specific perso
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00062.html (10,514 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Proposal for Modification of DXCC Rules (score: 1)
Author: Greg Wilson <n4cc@windstream.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 17:48:26 -0500
Larry -- I think your proposal provides the basis for a very workable solution and hope you will forward this idea to ARRL. I don't think the BOD gave this subject adequate consideration but your ide
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00110.html (11,273 bytes)

12. Topband: Polyphaser (score: 1)
Author: Greg Wilson <n4cc@windstream.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 07:17:03 -0500
Does anyone know how to test a Polyphaser to know if it is still good? I have some that have seen some lightning storms and was wondering if they are still doing the job. Thanks, Greg _______________
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00004.html (6,767 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: Tom RauchRE: W8JI is bailing out of this reflector? (score: 1)
Author: "Greg" <n4cc@windstream.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:09:45 -0700
Doug -- you're like the cops on the DX frequency...you just did exactly what you complained about. In my opinion Tom is a great guy and one of the most knowledgeable anywhere. I always read Tom's pos
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00537.html (9,650 bytes)

14. Topband: 160 4 square (score: 1)
Author: "Greg" <n4cc@windstream.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 12:56:44 -0600
Question for the group... 90 degrees apart from the top of the tower. Antenna wire will be attached to the phillystran such that verticals will be dropped to create a 4 square. I will have as much ve
/archives//html/Topband/2017-08/msg00038.html (7,090 bytes)

15. Topband: 160 4 square (score: 1)
Author: "Greg" <n4cc@windstream.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 18:53:20 -0600
Many thanks to all who offered input and ideas. I'll let you know how things come out after we get the system together next month. 73, Greg-N4CC _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://
/archives//html/Topband/2017-08/msg00048.html (6,663 bytes)

16. Re: Topband: FT8 qrm (score: 1)
Author: "Greg" <n4cc@windstream.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 09:05:21 -0700
Jeez -- enough already...how difficult is it to avoid 2.5 khz of bandwidth that is not even in the DX portion of the band! Leave FT8 alone and fight the QRM below 1835. 73, Greg-N4CC ________________
/archives//html/Topband/2017-11/msg00182.html (8,191 bytes)

17. Re: Topband: FT8 qrm (score: 1)
Author: "Greg" <n4cc@windstream.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 10:44:05 -0700
Just because you have the right to be on a frequency, if you know another interest group wants to use it and it has become that group's normal operating segment -- whether by gentleman's agreement or
/archives//html/Topband/2017-11/msg00189.html (10,158 bytes)

18. Re: Topband: FT8 qrm (score: 1)
Author: "Greg" <n4cc@windstream.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 12:03:26 -0700
When you say if not me, then one of the other 1000 of participants... it sounds a little like if other people are going to have poor operating technique, so should I. I never said that FT8 takes prec
/archives//html/Topband/2017-11/msg00195.html (12,485 bytes)

19. Re: Topband: E31 (score: 1)
Author: "Greg" <n4cc@windstream.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 05:37:36 -0700
And QUIT calling if he is not answering you! Ridiculous behavior. Patience and courtesy will help everyone. 73, Greg-N4CC Solid copy on them from my ss to their sr. But obvious they were having great
/archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00237.html (8,192 bytes)

20. Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters (score: 1)
Author: "Greg" <n4cc@windstream.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 09:57:51 -0700
I'm a 160 meter DXCC card checker...so I thought I would respond to this. First of all let me say that the DXCC card checkers really need to have an updated manual so that all card checkers have the
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00193.html (12,855 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu