Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n1rj@roadrunner.com: 107 ]

Total 107 documents matching your query.

81. Re: Topband: rohn insulators (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 21:24:36 -0500
I believe there is a slight misrepresentation here. I've never seen these in any Rohn catalog. Rather than calling them Rohn 25 tower insulators, I think they are better described as insulators for R
/archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00237.html (7,341 bytes)

82. Re: Topband: A "valid" QSO???? (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2015 11:48:07 -0500
In these days of deregulation, a QSO can be whatever you want it to be. Operating another station using your callsign, having another ham make the contact for you or even on a chat room where little
/archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00406.html (8,705 bytes)

83. Topband: JD1BMH (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 10:56:56 -0500
Wow! I heard Harry this AM for the first time ever! Unfortunately, he was weak and in the noise most of the time. Here's hoping propagation makes it's way a bit further north soon. 73, Roger N1RJ ___
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00076.html (6,923 bytes)

84. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 17:22:32 -0500
And, what happened to identifying with the call of the station you were operating? It's still in the regs. 73, Roger SO they did the next best thing and left it up to the individual to decide what is
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00238.html (12,410 bytes)

85. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 05:35:27 -0500
I heard from a friend, who talked to his uncle who stated that he heard on a 20m net, that hams are allowed to disregard any FCC rule that they find inconvenient. 73, Roger (a) The station licensee i
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00294.html (9,633 bytes)

86. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 09:12:32 -0500
In that case the government should get off it's butt and bring the rules up to date. As it is, we have the FCC publishing rules for the amateur service and the ARRL and others saying it's fine to dis
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00315.html (13,185 bytes)

87. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 07:08:48 -0500
Sounds a lot like the RHR folks! A friend of mine at the Georgia State Public Service Training Center (right down my street) says this social trend, made pandemic through Internet, has even been assi
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00402.html (10,142 bytes)

88. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 09:08:29 -0500
Sounds like someone retreating to his Homogenous Cluster where everyone agrees with him. Bye, Tom After 20 years, I'm leaving it.It sure went down the tubes. That was not nice. Lou W1QJ --Original Me
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00412.html (11,384 bytes)

89. Topband: Amateur stations (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 13:11:42 -0500
One final comment and then I'll be silent. I recently found this at: http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?job=call_signs&id=amateur Call Sign Systems A unique call sign is assigned to each amat
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00425.html (8,904 bytes)

90. Re: Topband: K5P in Zone 14 (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 13:27:11 -0500
According to Clublog's Leaderboard stations east of the Mississippi are almost nil. 73, Roger On 1/16/2016 12:58 PM, Jim Brown wrote: On Sat,1/16/2016 9:31 AM, Doug Turnbull wrote: The propagation go
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00427.html (9,568 bytes)

91. Re: Topband: K5P good job ! (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 16:14:50 -0500
There are some Top band operators that call incessantly no matter what station the DX comes back to. Of course that is not limited to 160m. 73, Roger What surprised me (why, I don't know-It just does
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00474.html (8,187 bytes)

92. Re: Topband: FCC regulations (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 06:32:14 -0500
It's apparent that some people have a very "creative" way of interpreting FCC regulations. If you want to operate YOUR station within the law, read and understand Part 97. Do NOT believe what anyone
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00494.html (8,768 bytes)

93. Re: Topband: K5P good job ! (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:36:02 -0500
The big problem is that this "system" works! It's simple statistics. The more times you send your call, the better chance of the DX picking it out of a pileup. I don't think the people that do this g
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00499.html (9,542 bytes)

94. Re: Topband: RHR (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 09:22:23 -0500
Just wondering what provisions have been made if a drunk operator gets on the remote station and wreaks havoc or if a remote transmitter malfunctions and starts spewing garbage? 73, Roger N1RJ ______
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00518.html (7,278 bytes)

95. Re: Topband: Big 160m openings just before K index spikes (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 10:31:04 -0500
I've made two LP QSOs with VK6. First was on 23 Feb 2007 at 2210Z with VK6HD the second was on 14 Feb 2010 at 2208Z with VK6GX. I thought there were more but I probably was thinking of 80m. 73, Roger
/archives//html/Topband/2017-12/msg00059.html (11,155 bytes)

96. Re: Topband: Adding a parasitic reflector to a vertical (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 14:45:00 -0500
The one big problem with parasitic arrays is that you must have low enough ground resistance to get the proper current to flow in the element. With a driven array, you can force the elements to have
/archives//html/Topband/2018-02/msg00055.html (8,218 bytes)

97. Re: Topband: Straws in the Wind ....A 160m Dx'ing Sea Change is Upon us! (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 08:46:04 -0400
I'm an Old Timer. I'll be 76 next month and have 299 confirmed on 160m. My goal is to join the magic 300 club. If that happens, and the digital modes become the modes of choice, I think I'll retire a
/archives//html/Topband/2018-04/msg00061.html (18,536 bytes)

98. Re: Topband: 7P8 last night (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 16:54:36 -0400
I worked them at 0402Z for number 300 on Top Band! Yea! I was beginning to get worried! The evening was notable in that I saw three different propagation modes here in SW Maine. The first, beginning
/archives//html/Topband/2019-03/msg00049.html (10,027 bytes)

99. Topband: Skip Distance (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 17:06:06 -0400
I've been running some tests on my 8 circle array with K1JB. Joe is 17 miles away and I sometimes notice deep fading on his signal. Makes plotting the antenna pattern very difficult. Is it possible t
/archives//html/Topband/2019-09/msg00053.html (6,349 bytes)

100. Re: [TowerTalk] Skip Distance (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 06:11:13 -0400
These test were in late morning to early afternoon. 73, Roger 73, Roger _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTal
/archives//html/Topband/2019-09/msg00057.html (7,293 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
This search system is powered by Namazu