Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:martin@ok1rr.com: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: BCB Filter - final selection (score: 1)
Author: Martin Kratoska <martin@ok1rr.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2020 01:31:13 +0200
This one is much better, however you should build it yourself... 73, Martin, OK1RR Dne 17. 04. 20 v 12:59 Edward via Topband napsal(a): Thank you all for your recommendations. Leaning towards this fi
/archives//html/Topband/2020-04/msg00083.html (7,758 bytes)

22. Re: Topband: CQ Zones (score: 1)
Author: Martin Kratoska <martin@ok1rr.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 15:36:31 +0100
Oh, FT8 should be proclaimed as illegal for DXCC (WAZ, WAS etc.) in mixed categories. This "mode" should be counted completely separated from traditional modes like CW or SSB. 73, Martin, OK1RR Dne 0
/archives//html/Topband/2021-03/msg00032.html (9,898 bytes)

23. Re: Topband: CQ Zones (score: 1)
Author: Martin Kratoska <martin@ok1rr.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 17:40:55 +0100
Bob et al, all these rules can be preprogrammed into SV5DKL's robot which can "do the QSO". Otherwise I can tell my dog where to paw, he would be possibly a better FT8 "operator" than mine. There is
/archives//html/Topband/2021-03/msg00044.html (13,513 bytes)

24. Re: Topband: CQ Zones (score: 1)
Author: Martin Kratoska <martin@ok1rr.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:25:58 +0100
Glenn (VA3DX), BRAVO, I applaud! So you claim the privilege to decide who should leave and who is allowed to stay. And you will do it for ALL members of the list. You are a brilliant character. The l
/archives//html/Topband/2021-03/msg00065.html (15,425 bytes)

25. Re: Topband: CQ Zones (score: 1)
Author: Martin Kratoska <martin@ok1rr.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:50:49 +0100
Jim, FIRST - thank you so much for your excellent technical references. It helps a lot, I highly appreciate your unparalleled performance. SECOND - am I allowed to differ between a QSO between living
/archives//html/Topband/2021-03/msg00066.html (11,305 bytes)

26. Re: Topband: removing ft8 from dxcc waz was etc (score: 1)
Author: Martin Kratoska <martin@ok1rr.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 18:48:24 +0100
First - before any comment: I thoroughly tested FT8. Trying to "be on" since the very first steps of FT8. Made some ~3000 QSO with 150 countries DXCC. Studied the protocol into depth to understand wh
/archives//html/Topband/2021-03/msg00087.html (16,362 bytes)

27. Re: Topband: removing ft8 from dxcc waz was etc (score: 1)
Author: Martin Kratoska <martin@ok1rr.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 18:57:28 +0100
Doug, you read my mind. Thanks a lot, OC. I owe you a beer... 73 Martin, OK1RR Dne 10. 03. 21 v 17:11 Glenn Wyant napsal(a): Sorry to offend you Doug....and Martin However when another ham tries to t
/archives//html/Topband/2021-03/msg00089.html (12,910 bytes)

28. Re: Topband: QRM Eliminator (score: 1)
Author: Martin Kratoska <martin@ok1rr.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2022 21:12:24 +0200
Nothing against NCC phasers but I would try the PA0SIM phaser http://www.pa0sim.nl/Phaser%2080%20-%2010%20meters.htm before making any decisions. It can be better than any NCC, assumed that the ampli
/archives//html/Topband/2022-10/msg00013.html (9,628 bytes)

29. Re: Topband: Small Loop does not receive weak signal on 160m BOUVET RX SPOILER (score: 1)
Author: Martin Kratoska <martin@ok1rr.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 05:19:55 +0100
The Langford theory is here: https://www.okdxf.eu/lankford/Flag%20Theory%20rev%204.pdf and https://okdxf.eu/lankford/Flag%20Theory%20II.pdf and also attached. 73, Martin,  OK1RR Dne 24. 12. 22 v 2:46
/archives//html/Topband/2022-12/msg00148.html (25,872 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 29
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu