Mail Archive Search: <+from:km1h@juno.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:km1h@juno.com: 316 ]

Total 316 documents matching your query.

21. TopBand: Topband Receiver Survey Follow-up (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 11:03:39 EST; Your thinking of the Schottky product detector diode mod....and yes I did them also to my TS-830 and TS-940's to reduce audio distortion on strong signals. I used 1N5711's. Many have asked for my tes; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00058.html (8,983 bytes)
22. TopBand: : [WSVHF] TS-940 Specs (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 10:30:41 EST; To all those on Topband who asked...here is the results of the TS-940 tests. 73 Carl KM1H -- Begin forwarded message -- From: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com) To: wsvhf@qth.net Subject: [WSVHF] TS-940; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00068.html (10,046 bytes)
23. TopBand: Elevated GP vs. Vertical Antennas (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 18:15:51 EST; ALL SNIPPED SNIP Tom...Rauch that is...I'm getting confused...again. Are you saying that a vertical with X number of elevated radials is 6dB below the same radiator with X number of on ground radials; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00079.html (11,850 bytes)
24. TopBand: Elevated GP vs. Vertical Antennas (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Fri, 06 Mar 1998 14:51:56 EST; Sounds good Dave. My wire verticals are full size also and hung from the top guys of a 180' tower. They are about 50-60' apart total at the top and 130' apart at 20' above ground with 12 or less elev; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00112.html (17,343 bytes)
25. TopBand: Elevated GP vs. Vertical Antennas (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Sat, 07 Mar 1998 10:16:45 EST; To Tom and those on the reflector that are following the elevated radial discussion. Nor do I have any idea as to efficiency. My gut feeling is that this site is not as good as my old QTH 4 miles awa; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00121.html (15,874 bytes)
26. TopBand: Elevated GP vs. Vertical Antennas (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Sun, 08 Mar 1998 18:08:04 EST; Tom, I believe that those professionals who have published their information for peer review should be praised...and not belittled as you are trying. If you wish to publish your particular version of; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00132.html (12,471 bytes)
27. TopBand: Re: Elevated Radials (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Mon, 09 Mar 1998 11:52:45 EST; To Topband....forewarded without comment Carl KM1H _____________________________________________________________________ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get complet; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00142.html (11,236 bytes)
28. TopBand: Broadcast field strength (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Mon, 09 Mar 1998 14:21:53 EST; Hi Al. In practice I find it takes about 2000 miles before my verticals outperform a 160' high inverted Vee. But doesnt the strength ( or efficiency...Im not hung up on terminology) of the groundwave; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00145.html (8,831 bytes)
29. TopBand: Re: Elevated Radials (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Mon, 09 Mar 1998 15:52:26 EST; So mail me the pertinent data and lets get it off the reflector. I will PAY ALL copy and mail costs. Here is NOT why ... who approved/requested that test configuration? The station owner, the consult; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00147.html (13,300 bytes)
30. TopBand: Elevated GP vs. Vertical Antennas (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 11:54:57 EST; SNIP Eric, thank you for a most thoughtful response. I would rather wait for the new Antenna/Technical reflector to be activated in order to discuss this and further my education. That should happen; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00204.html (10,222 bytes)
31. TopBand: : fs-(2)Eimac 8875's- (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 12:36:20 EST; I suspect there will be some interest here on these scarce tubes. Contact him...NOT me please. 73 Carl KM1H -- To: <topband@contesting.com> tubes out. marks or -- End forwarded message -- ___________; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00205.html (7,629 bytes)
32. TopBand: Elevated GP vs. Vertical Antennas (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 15:56:28 EST; I will try and be brief. Eric are you then saying that the BCB requirements/measurements have pretty much no bearing on DX oriented 160M operators? If you read published info on "optimum" angles, it; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00211.html (10,932 bytes)
33. TopBand: Angles vs efficiency, etc. (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 12:08:30 EST; I sure have been learning a lot here lately, thanks to several contributors. What has become obvious is that I cannot compete in terms of efficiency and low angles with guys like K0HA and his wonderf; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00237.html (8,112 bytes)
34. TopBand: : MLA-2500 (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 18:33:14 EST; More on the MLA-2500 for 160M DXpeditions. Contact him..NOT me. 73 Carl KM1H Steve Chamberlain...AI4R...Estero..FL..Monday, March 16, 1998 Listing (#7.0316) I have an MLA-2500 in very good condition; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00241.html (7,012 bytes)
35. TopBand: Elevated GP vs. Vertical Antennas (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 14:01:21 EST; Eric, Hardy, Bill, Jeff, Yuri....etc. tnx for all the input. Eric, I will seriously edit your post so as to keep W4ZV contented. I also sent off some more questions yesterday to the reflector as I am; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00251.html (19,527 bytes)
36. TopBand: NEC-4 Availability (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 19:57:25 EST; We may actually be reaching that plateau where rhetoric is either proved or disproved by sophisticated software...the military has used it for years. It now seems that us mere mortals can benefit als; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00256.html (6,992 bytes)
37. TopBand: NEC-4 info (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 20:09:01 EST; I have been advised that NEC4.1 computations have been included with an Al Christman article in the ARRL Antenna Compendium # 5. It is supposed to include extensive math for those so inclined . I tru; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00257.html (7,216 bytes)
38. TopBand: Elevated Radials (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 10:25:31 EST; On Tue, 17 Mar 1998 23:56:31 EST k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham) writes: Earl, Christman covered that in a QST followup to his original article. It was in Technical Correspondence I believe. Perhap; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00272.html (10,185 bytes)
39. TopBand: Elevated Radials (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 15:38:49 EST; On Wed, 18 Mar 98 14:58:34 -0500 John Kaufmann <kaufmann@ll.mit.edu> writes: C'mon John....you said nor explained nothing. Does NEC-4xx accurately model on or near ground radials or not?? With your M; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00278.html (11,299 bytes)
40. TopBand: Elevated Radials (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 16:43:54 EST; So we are now into the "I'm not sure" realm of reporting? I personally do not care who is right....just what can be proven without continuing hyperbole. PLEASE stick to facts...not personal comments; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00279.html (12,012 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]