Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ken.d.brown@verizon.net: 46 ]

Total 46 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: verticals (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 10:24:00 -1000
There may be reasons for certain heights. I found from Smith chart work that the 70 foot was optimum for 80m as a single series C was all the network needed to cover most of that band. Hi Bob, Thanks
/archives//html/Topband/2004-04/msg00146.html (7,766 bytes)

22. Re: Topband: beverages: Diversity / Phasing (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 11:47:59 -1000
Hi Tom, It seems like people are using the term "diversity" incorrectly. I don't have an authoritative definition. It would be interesting to know what people think diversity is. I can think of a few
/archives//html/Topband/2004-05/msg00070.html (8,860 bytes)

23. Re: Topband: buried radial problems. (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 18:03:55 -1000
But the Kinstar patent changes all the rules. Excuse me, no offense intended, but THE RULES NEVER CHANGE. This is physics. Sometimes we discover that what we thought were the rules need some refineme
/archives//html/Topband/2004-12/msg00286.html (8,422 bytes)

24. Topband: ARRL Contest Log Deadline (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 14:08:55 -1000
A reminder to fellow procrastinators: Log submissions for the 2004 ARRL 160 Contest are due January 5th 2005 _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.co
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00001.html (6,628 bytes)

25. Topband: RST and S meter readings not the same. (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 09:55:30 -1000
Hi all, There are many reasons that S meter readings are irrelevant to an RST report. Most of those reasons have already been discussed, and they deal with the wide range of S meter response to signa
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00140.html (7,319 bytes)

26. Topband: NH6KB QSL SASEs (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 20:09:36 -1000
I have received several SASEs for QSLs for QSOs made in the 2004 ARRL 160 Meter Contest. They WILL be answered. I am waiting for some nice QSL cards, instead of using cards with the wrong callsign. H
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00291.html (6,824 bytes)

27. Topband: 160 meter condx tonight (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 20:53:32 -1000
I'd like to thank all the operators who stuck with me and repeated their callsigns over and over and over tonight. The QRN is absolutely terrible in KH6 tonight. Signals from NA are very good, but th
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00326.html (6,546 bytes)

28. Re: Topband: Elevated vs Buried Radials (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 09:23:55 -1000
Hi Gary, This is so typical of vertical/radial system performance comparison data. Of course more data is better, and I am glad this data has been published (even though I can't see it) I sure would
/archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00055.html (8,036 bytes)

29. Re: Topband: Hi Contacts (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 13:27:53 -1000
Hi Gene, and anybody else who wants a KH6 QSO on topband, Yes I am in Hilo, on the big island (that is what we call the island of Hawaii here) I'll be glad to attempt a QSO with any mainland station.
/archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00065.html (7,293 bytes)

30. Topband: CQ Long Path (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 08:09:51 -1000
Hi all, I wonder why does anyone call "CQ LP"? I can understand calling "CQ DX". That generally means you don't want the guy down the street, or in the adjacent state, or in the same "DXCC entity" to
/archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00139.html (6,921 bytes)

31. Topband: Radials (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 18:40:20 -1000
"If you have really good soil, you might get by with less. If it were me, I would go with 40 to 60 depending on how hard it is to put them down." In most cases, I would guess, the harder it is to put
/archives//html/Topband/2005-04/msg00118.html (6,383 bytes)

32. Topband: QSLs in the mail (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:06:45 -1000
Hi all, QSLs for contest QSOs with NH6KB went into the mail in SASEs today to the following stations: WA5VGI, AA6XV, K6UIZ, KA6UMQ, W6VFU, AC7PN, WA7FKV, K8NKQ, W8TE, K0SR, W0GG I'll try to be more p
/archives//html/Topband/2005-04/msg00140.html (6,286 bytes)

33. Re: Topband: phasing two verticals (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 09:10:35 -1000
Hi, Regarding the following: Is the folloing true? If you can make the verticals identical, and the surrounding ground system the same for each vertical, and the effects of nearby objects negligible,
/archives//html/Topband/2005-06/msg00025.html (7,572 bytes)

34. Re: Topband: phasing two verticals (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 23:47:28 -1000
In that case, even if you do get the currents equal in magnitude and in the correct phase relative to each other at the feed points, the current distribution over the whole of each vertical is not n
/archives//html/Topband/2005-06/msg00030.html (7,637 bytes)

35. Re: Topband: Reversible Beverage (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 18:11:39 -1000
Hi Mike, I once built seven two wire Beverages at the Cuesta College Radio Club. I used the method explained by Misek in his book Beverage Antenna Handbook. I believe that several issues of the ARRL
/archives//html/Topband/2005-09/msg00036.html (8,611 bytes)

36. Re: Topband: Tuning elevated radials (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 10:38:16 -1000
We could balance the radial currents by putting series resistances in them. Given the choice, I would rather have less resistance and higher current regardless of balance. Especially considering the
/archives//html/Topband/2005-09/msg00044.html (8,394 bytes)

37. Re: Topband: WB4ENE - MRA (minimal reactance antenna) (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 13:45:50 -1000
This antenna may well fit some specific application with better efficiency than any other design. For instance an application that requires it can fit on a large truck, and be driven under bridges wi
/archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00243.html (7,820 bytes)

38. Re: Topband: FW: ERROR IN ARRL 160M CONTEST RULES ? (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 23:15:09 -1000
Any comments? Yes, I do have a comment about QST reporting of the scores. QST has reduced their coverage of the 160 meter contest scores to show only the top ten in each catagory and then in their "R
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00034.html (8,455 bytes)

39. Topband: QRP scoring in contests (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 11:12:20 -1000
In every contest I know of, which gives a higher multiplier for QRP operation, the QRP multiplier is an all or nothing deal. You cannot use your better judgment and switch on the PA to complete a QSO
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00131.html (7,634 bytes)

40. Topband: Log Submission (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:47:09 -1000
Hi all, A couple of questions about my log submission: I used CT DOS IARU mode and am editing the log using word pad. The log submission robot can be very picky, so I want to get every detail right t
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00227.html (7,741 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu