- 1. Topband: Wire Vertical advice (score: 1)
- Author: k8unp@shadow.net (Pete Rimmel N8PR)
- Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 09:52:58 -0500
- If It were me, I would feed the tower with an elevated radial system, insullated from the tower, placed down 1/4 wavelength electrically from the top of your 'loaded' tower (loaded with HF antennas a
- /archives//html/Topband/1999-11/msg00094.html (7,410 bytes)
- 2. Topband: 160m biological effects (score: 1)
- Author: k8unp@Shadow.net (Pete Rimmel)
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 11:48:16 -0700
- Since the biological effects (that cause brain damage and cancer) due to RF are related to localized heating from the RF, I can't imagine a signal on 160 being concentrated enough to be a problem. I
- /archives//html/Topband/1999-10/msg00063.html (7,174 bytes)
- 3. Topband: 160m sloper problem (score: 1)
- Author: k8unp@shadow.net (Pete Rimmel N8PR)
- Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 20:16:26 -0400
- Ted, I have used various slopers from 60 ft towers, but not 50 ft towers. However, with the top loading on the tower, I found that the 160 sloper was not resonant with 130 ft. It was longer. You have
- /archives//html/Topband/1999-09/msg00122.html (8,516 bytes)
- 4. Topband: MFJ-1026 or ANC-4 (score: 1)
- Author: k8unp@shadow.net (Pete Rimmel)
- Date: Mon, 02 Aug 1999 11:26:29 -0700
- I use the ANC-4 very successfully on 160 M. I had at one time a nouse 20 over S-9 which I was able to get down to about S-2 with the noise canceller... Later was able to eliminate the noise - A pole
- /archives//html/Topband/1999-08/msg00004.html (8,124 bytes)
- 5. Topband: The eleventh commandment of 160m DXing? (score: 1)
- Author: k8unp@shadow.net (Pete Rimmel N8PR)
- Date: Sat, 28 Aug 1999 12:53:24 -0400
- But, Steve, they might not have been hearing you, and called since he had no one else to work. I hear that allt he time from C6 when I am there. 73 and I hope you get him next time... That is the fun
- /archives//html/Topband/1999-08/msg00074.html (9,800 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu