Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k6uj@pacbell.net: 126 ]

Total 126 documents matching your query.

61. Re: Topband: Best wire antenna for roof top location (score: 1)
Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 09:54:42 -0700
I'm still laughing !! Ollie did try a safety idea when he tied a rope around his waist in case he fell. Who would have thought the brick chimney would come crashing down ? HIHIHI thanks Frank ! Bob K
/archives//html/Topband/2015-08/msg00057.html (9,359 bytes)

62. Topband: Changing to Synthetic Lube in Tower Gearbox (score: 1)
Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 19:38:19 -0700
Rick, I finished one more flush in my reduction gear. As I mentioned, my lube was still pretty dark colored to my satisfaction after the first flush operation. This time I used the turkey baster to t
/archives//html/Topband/2015-09/msg00063.html (10,292 bytes)

63. Re: Topband: DxCoffee - Daily updates (score: 1)
Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 19:20:59 -0800
Thanks Glen, found it Bob K6UJ 73, Glenn - KD0Q The DX news, contest calendar down the left hand side, as well as the DX coffee news on the right hand side is/are in English and the links for each li
/archives//html/Topband/2015-11/msg00015.html (17,402 bytes)

64. Re: Topband: Why do rodents eat coax? (score: 1)
Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 18:40:27 -0800
No one has answered the original question of "why do rodents eat coax" The reason rodents eat coax, and they like 50 ohm coax the best, is their digestive system is 50 ohms impedance, their SWR goes
/archives//html/Topband/2015-11/msg00067.html (10,059 bytes)

65. Re: Topband: Ideas for xmit antennas for new QTH in KH6 (score: 1)
Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 17:34:09 -0800
You guys have inspired me. I am going to try the same thing. I have toyed with the idea of a T-top and will try it too. Please give feedback on how it goes, I will too. Bob K6UJ On 12/9/15 4:52 PM, J
/archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00130.html (9,234 bytes)

66. Re: Topband: QRP (score: 1)
Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 15:33:02 -0800
Jim, Do the 160 verticals with 4 radials elevated at 20 feet, individually outperform the other vertical with 60 radials on the ground ? Bob K6UJ On 12/15/15 3:02 PM, Jim Brown wrote: On Tue,12/15/20
/archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00167.html (9,690 bytes)

67. Re: Topband: QRP (score: 1)
Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 15:50:21 -0800
Jim, OK, I am working on a similar arrangement with 4 elevated radials at 14 feet. Hence the question. thanks, Bob K6UJ I have no meaningful way to measure that, but work by N6LF and N6BT suggest tha
/archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00170.html (9,570 bytes)

68. Re: Topband: QRP (score: 1)
Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 15:59:11 -0800
Mike, Thats good stuff ! I am putting up a 160 with 4 elevated radials at 14 feet (would like to get them higher but they are the least visible at 14 feet to my wife :-) I am anxious to see how it wo
/archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00172.html (10,188 bytes)

69. Re: Topband: QRP (score: 1)
Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 19:30:15 -0800
Hardy, Wow, that is great results ! I am anxious to get mine up. It has been raining a lot here in northern CA and I am doing the antenna work sporadically on dryer days. Thanks for sharing your resu
/archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00178.html (11,213 bytes)

70. Re: Topband: ARRL book on short antennas for 160 meters (score: 1)
Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:27:33 -0800
I was curious too Jim. I aint buyin it either hihihi 73, Bob K6UJ OKKKKKKKKKKK...read enuff replies - I ain't buying that book!! Tnx for alllllll the replies Anyone read "Short Antennas for 160 Meter
/archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00189.html (8,396 bytes)

71. Re: Topband: 160m LP to LP DX contacts in 2015 (score: 1)
Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 07:48:44 -0800
Herb, Herb, In order for us to respond to your allegations you will need to provide support evidence. We will need details on his actual antenna configuration, was he using a counterpoise of some sor
/archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00206.html (9,803 bytes)

72. Re: Topband: 160m LP to LP DX contacts in 2015 (score: 1)
Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 11:26:13 -0800
Herb, No one is questioning your qualifications or expertise Herb. I am an engineer also. The point I attempted to get across is that it is in very poor taste for us to post on a public reflector neg
/archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00215.html (15,052 bytes)

73. Re: Topband: RUSSIAN 160 METER CONTES (score: 1)
Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:11:35 -0800
Yes it does, and I'm sure Herb knows it too. :-) It's his engineering nature to "fix" things. Bob K6UJ 73, Mike www.w0btu.com Vladimir........Why not at least hold at least a small portion of the con
/archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00234.html (7,863 bytes)

74. Topband: 160M ant advice (score: 1)
Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 18:06:34 -0800
I am planning an install of a 160M inverted L and would like critique from you top banders. I was originally planning a separate tower for 160 but my XYL has squashed the idea :-) My tower is 90 feet
/archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00235.html (7,781 bytes)

75. Re: Topband: 160M ant advice (score: 1)
Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:11:58 -0800
Stan, With shunt feed I would gain the 18 foot mast with the yagis, the total overall height is 108 feet. I haven't really considered shunt feeding. I see your point of the wires with an L in proximi
/archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00247.html (10,220 bytes)

76. Re: Topband: 160M ant advice (score: 1)
Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:44:01 -0800
Gene, The cage design sounds very interesting. I just ordered the book :-) thanks Gene, Bob K6UJ On 12/18/15 9:27 AM, Gene Smar wrote: Bob: I built my shunt feed wire cage based on the design in Jeff
/archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00252.html (11,066 bytes)

77. Re: Topband: 160M ant advice (score: 1)
Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 10:16:34 -0800
Gene, AD3F also suggested a cage. It looks like a great way to go. You mentioned using a flat wound AM BC coil in your matching arrangement. I have a Gates flatwound roller inductor that may have bee
/archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00254.html (13,849 bytes)

78. Re: Topband: 160M ant advice (score: 1)
Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 12:33:42 -0800
Gentlemen, Thanks for all the info and advice on putting up a 160M antenna. I have received help both on and off the reflector. I wasn't sure whether to post the question because I know you have disc
/archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00258.html (8,006 bytes)

79. Re: Topband: Weatherproofing F-type connectors (score: 1)
Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 15:04:56 -0800
Renee speaks the truth :-) I use these connectors myself Larry. They have a double o-ring seal and are indeed water proof. Have been using them for quite some time now outside and no water intrusion.
/archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00266.html (11,172 bytes)

80. Re: Topband: ARRL 160CW Contest QRP Portable Op (score: 1)
Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 17:43:23 -0800
Herb, I feel the same way. I have nothing against QRP, but for me personally I don't have the desire to handicap myself with QRP power especially on 160. It doesn't seem fair to me for the guy on the
/archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00335.html (13,771 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]
This search system is powered by Namazu