Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k6uj@pacbell.net: 126 ]

Total 126 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: Detuning transmit antenna in receive (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 13:37:55 -0700
I am very interested in this subject, I am trying to figure out how to detune my 160 inverted L. I am using a flag antenna for receive and unfortunately it is only about 50 feet from the base of the
/archives//html/Topband/2012-06/msg00145.html (10,221 bytes)

22. Re: Topband: Noise in the Shack - A new noise! (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 09:22:19 -0700
I'm with Bill, I still use external drives for backups for the same reason, but am tempted with "the cloud" Maybe our worries are unfounded ? Do the "cloud" systems back up the data (on external hard
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00077.html (8,746 bytes)

23. Re: Topband: Mother of all ferrite common-mode coaxial chokes (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 13:37:44 -0700
I agree with Tom on the F-connectors. I (now) have great results with the type-F connectors for my low band receive antennas. I was getting flaky connections with the connectors for some time and fin
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00175.html (11,420 bytes)

24. Re: Topband: Mother of all ferrite common-mode coaxial chokes (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 17:21:50 -0700
wouldn't it be more fitting to say it has reached saturation ? :-) Bob K6UJ _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00179.html (14,781 bytes)

25. Re: Topband: NH8S on Topband (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:07:30 -0700
wow, I had better get my ## in gear and finish getting my inverted L back up. thanks Herb, Bob K6UJ _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-09/msg00045.html (7,032 bytes)

26. Re: Topband: NH8S on Topband (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 19:28:15 -0700
hihihi ! Bob K6UJ _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-09/msg00050.html (8,545 bytes)

27. Re: Topband: The use of digital modes on 160 metres (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 16:54:26 -0700
I think the digital modes should QRP on top band to make it fair. :-) :-) Bob K6UJ _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-09/msg00196.html (10,168 bytes)

28. Re: Topband: Vertical dipoles in the real world (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:18:25 -0700
Jim, I'm very interested in your experience with vertical vs horiz dipoles for 40 meters. I have a similar situation in the works. I am using a vertical dipole for 40 meters with the top attached to
/archives//html/Topband/2012-09/msg00213.html (10,225 bytes)

29. Re: Topband: Response to W8JI's comments about using a K2AV foldedcounterpoise at VK6VZ (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 16:02:57 -0700
Tom, FWIW, I have been following this discussion and will agree that your intended points somehow get changed. Also, I totally agree with your statement "when multiple things are changed in a randoml
/archives//html/Topband/2012-09/msg00240.html (11,499 bytes)

30. Re: Topband: K6STI low noise receive loop (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 18:41:28 -0700
If you try the K6STI low noise loop please let us know your results. I have tried a number of low noise receiving loops, currently am playing with a Waller flag. The K6STI loop is very interesting, I
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00102.html (8,869 bytes)

31. Re: Topband: 160 meter elevated vertical (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 17:36:17 -0700
I hear what you are saying Guy. Every vertical installation is a unique situation. I dont have enough technical knowledge to determine when my vertical antennas could do without a common mode choke.
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00265.html (9,287 bytes)

32. Re: Topband: Tuning 160M Dipole (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 16:56:25 -0700
Paul, Here is a handy on line calculator to help you determine the approx wire length. You can play with putting in different freqs and see how much the wire length changes. I believe with frequency
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00376.html (7,826 bytes)

33. Re: Topband: Antenna analysers in close proximity to BC station. (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 14:53:11 -0700
Tom, I will be interested to see what the solution(s) will be for the BC station interference. Wanted to thank for the reference to the impedance problem calculators. They are great! 73, Bob K6UJ ___
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00007.html (8,941 bytes)

34. Re: Topband: PT0S (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 19:28:38 -0800
I know the feeling! Not sure if you are in the log....... Hope you made it ! I havent been successful yet with making a contact but there is still a week to go. It is great to see a DXPedition put em
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00129.html (8,781 bytes)

35. Re: Topband: F fitting adaptors (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 17:00:02 -0800
here is a supplier http://www.l-com.com/item.aspx?id=5413 Bob K6UJ _______________________________________________ Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00090.html (7,326 bytes)

36. Re: Topband: 3Y0IOF (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 19:16:35 -0800
Count me in too. Can you give me a senior ham discount ? I just turned 65. Can you also contact the ARRL LOTW group and update my countries total after logging me in ? thanks so much Bob K6UJ _______
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00152.html (7,476 bytes)

37. Re: Topband: raised radials (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 10:50:07 -0800
I also have a 40M GP with 4 elevated resonant radials 6" above the ground. I will be putting up a vertical dipole for 40M center fed with a choke balun for comparison on DX and will compare with the
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00408.html (10,204 bytes)

38. Re: Topband: raised radials (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:58:25 -0800
Charlie, I will post my results. I had a vertical dipole up before and now am using the 40M GP. The vertical dipole "seems" to be the best performer for DX but what does that mean, hihi. I thought I
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00410.html (12,858 bytes)

39. Topband: vertical dipole vs vertical with elev radials (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 18:52:02 -0800
Charlie, Yeah I see what you mean they each have a different take off angle lobe. I will run a run a plot with EZNEC of each and see what they show. I have changed/ started a new subject title for th
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00423.html (15,688 bytes)

40. Topband: vertical dipole vs vertical with elev radials (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 19:00:30 -0800
Jim, I will post the results here on the reflector. Note the changed subject for this thread to cover this activity. We have drifted away from the original thread. Yes, please share your results on t
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00424.html (13,638 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu