Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k6se@juno.com: 594 ]

Total 594 documents matching your query.

361. TopBand: Ref: Oppolzer's Canon of Eclipses, published 1887 (score: 1)
Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham)
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 1998 01:09:48 EST
On Thu, 05 Feb 1998 19:01:22 -0500 LEE ROGER WICAL <leewical@lava.net> writes: An interesting discussion. But the data I have is the Solar Eclipse on the 26th Feb (25th N.A. Time) is that the total s
/archives//html/Topband/1998-02/msg00065.html (7,637 bytes)

362. TopBand: Topband Receiver Survey - Results (score: 1)
Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham)
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 1998 18:49:37 EST
Hi, All, I want to thank all (about 30 replied) who responded to the survey on receivers used by Topband DX operators. I've grouped the comments received to the 9 original questions I asked. If an an
/archives//html/Topband/1998-02/msg00077.html (42,220 bytes)

363. TopBand: Follow-up on Topband Receiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham)
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 1998 12:36:36 EST
commercial >transmitters seem to be so bad on key clicks? Look at the keying waveforms >in QST and the spectral displays in Radcom, and you can see that they seem >to have been designed for 60 or 70
/archives//html/Topband/1998-02/msg00086.html (9,094 bytes)

364. TopBand: Follow-up on Topband Receiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham)
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 1998 16:27:08 EST
On Mon, 09 Feb 1998 11:49:12 -0600 Tom Delker <k1ky@bellsouth.net> writes: == Maybe ARRL should report "clickability" in their product reviews, rather than just displaying the waveform (is anyone fro
/archives//html/Topband/1998-02/msg00091.html (8,385 bytes)

365. TopBand: Follow-up on Topband Receiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham)
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 01:58:15 EST
The ham that sent me this message wishes to remain anonymous. It might be of interest to topband owners of FT-1000MPs. Earl, Your question about key clicks is very relevant. It is a serious problem w
/archives//html/Topband/1998-02/msg00097.html (10,868 bytes)

366. TopBand: Re: Follow-up on Topband Receiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham)
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 12:36:09 EST
== I didn't make note of which signals were clicky, Bill, because after all the negative things said about the TS-830S receiver, I really thought the problem was at my end. For now, all I can say is
/archives//html/Topband/1998-02/msg00103.html (8,197 bytes)

367. TopBand: Receiver Survey Follow-up (score: 1)
Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham)
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 17:37:56 EST
Klaus, DJ6RX gave me permission to post this message he sent to Riki, 4X4NJ. It seemed fair to let others see his comments about the FT-1000MP, TS-930, FT-1000D, and R-4C. "Riki, Be aware the F-T1000
/archives//html/Topband/1998-02/msg00128.html (8,330 bytes)

368. TopBand: 9M0C Ops and Operation (score: 1)
Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 10:56:48 EST
Kudos to the members of the 9M0C DXpedition! What an outstanding signal on all bands! With 65k+ QSOs -- if not #1, it must rate as one of the most successful DXpeditions of all time. Many Topbanders
/archives//html/Topband/1998-02/msg00267.html (7,053 bytes)

369. TopBand: "HTM"-Re-format Possible? (score: 1)
Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham)
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 1998 17:26:50 EST
software >that will convert a .htm file so that I can download and print W4RNL's writings graphs >or illustrations. Very frustrating! == I couldn't read or print .htm files until I located a free dow
/archives//html/Topband/1998-01/msg00029.html (7,918 bytes)

370. TopBand: BY1QH (score: 1)
Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham)
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 1998 12:16:33 EST
Got up at 1415Z, rig on at 1420, checked 1825.5 mHz for 8Q7AA, but nil. Heard a big pile of 6s & 7s on 1831 +/- calling BY1QH. There he was, on 1827.5 calling CQ. Worked him at 1425Z, then listened t
/archives//html/Topband/1998-01/msg00194.html (8,205 bytes)

371. TopBand: K8CFU (score: 1)
Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham)
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 1998 16:48:20 EST
I Ran across an old buddy of mine via e-mail last week. We used to yak at each other on 10-meter mobile on the way to work in the Detroit area back in the late 50s (during that tremendous sunspot pea
/archives//html/Topband/1998-01/msg00199.html (7,077 bytes)

372. TopBand: BY1QH 160 Logs (score: 1)
Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham)
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 14:47:50 EST
Is that a typo, or didn't he get the complete callsign? -- I monitored his QSO the morning of 19 Jan with KN6DV (not K6DV). The >following stations are listed... -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.
/archives//html/Topband/1998-01/msg00260.html (7,159 bytes)

373. TopBand: CQ 160 Contest Winner Predictions (score: 1)
Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham)
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 1998 15:12:23 EST
Hi, y'all, An enjoyable (but rigorous for an old fart like me) contest, as usual. Condx were mediocre here in So. California in about every direction. The first night was marred somewhat by T-storm s
/archives//html/Topband/1998-01/msg00283.html (8,799 bytes)

374. TopBand: Receivers used on Topband (score: 1)
Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham)
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 1998 19:41:24 EST
Hi, all, A lot has been said on this Reflector about 160m antennas, both transmitting and receiving, but very little about another vital Topband ingredient -- the station receiver. I think a survey o
/archives//html/Topband/1998-01/msg00327.html (8,377 bytes)

375. TopBand: TS-870S IMD improvement Mod (score: 1)
Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham)
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 1997 00:57:45 EST
== The so-called "IMD" problem on CW in the early TS-870S's is due to the wider IF selectivity stages before the IF DSP. i.e., if the DSP is set to say, 100 Hz, strong signals within +/- 1.5 kHz or s
/archives//html/Topband/1997-12/msg00052.html (8,365 bytes)

376. TopBand: Shunt matching tower for 160M (score: 1)
Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham)
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 1997 00:57:45 EST
Topband, do though, (soon!) the == There WILL be some top loading effect, Steve. Not just from the booms of the antennas, but from the driven elements also (due to the coupling to the tower from thei
/archives//html/Topband/1997-12/msg00053.html (11,823 bytes)

377. TopBand: ARRL 160 Rules (score: 1)
Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham)
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 1997 06:48:58 EST
Hello TopBanders, Greg, ZS5K asked about the ARRL Section multipliers in this coming weekend's ARRL 160 Meter Contest. I thought that it would be appropriate to post the list here on the TopBand Refl
/archives//html/Topband/1997-12/msg00059.html (10,710 bytes)

378. TopBand: Re: ARRL 160 Contest (score: 1)
Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham)
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 1997 07:01:14 EST
Dear Topbanders: I just sent the ARRL/RAC Sections list with a summary of rules, and realized I made a serious error (as usual). I'm 9 days off on the contest time period. The correct dayes are start
/archives//html/Topband/1997-12/msg00060.html (6,814 bytes)

379. TopBand: ARRL/NAC Sections (score: 1)
Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham)
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 1997 18:02:38 EST
Hello, Topbanders, I had two responses regarding errors in the ARRL/NAC Sections list that I posted last night. First, MD (Maryland) and DC (District of Columbia) are NOT separate sections. They are
/archives//html/Topband/1997-12/msg00074.html (7,121 bytes)

380. TopBand: Need source of info for Noise problems (score: 1)
Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham)
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 1997 19:59:48 EST
Hi, Ron, Years ago, So Cal Edison had a ham (I forget his call) working for them that speciallized in tracking down power line noises. He was quite sympathetic to hams, and therefore was quite helpfu
/archives//html/Topband/1997-12/msg00122.html (7,786 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu