Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k3ky@radioprism.com: 45 ]

Total 45 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: Variable Flag Termination? (score: 1)
Author: David Sinclair <k3ky@radioprism.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 23:34:06 -0500
Have you read the work of WA1ION? He has done quite a lot with remote variable terminations, and has collected extensive data. I have seen more from him, which a search should pull up easily, but he
/archives//html/Topband/2008-01/msg00024.html (8,362 bytes)

22. Re: Topband: Topband List Update (score: 1)
Author: k3ky@radioprism.com
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:44:56 -0700
Very happy to see you try this, Tree. I hope it works. BTW thanks very much for taking on all the work of running the reflector! Probably most members know how much of an effort is involved. You may
/archives//html/Topband/2009-10/msg00233.html (8,015 bytes)

23. Re: Topband: A little off topic (score: 1)
Author: k3ky@radioprism.com
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:31:21 -0700
Good going, Trent I'm a bit of a packrat myself, and have dozens and dozens of those power supplies. In addition to saving money, there is one more benefit from hoarding them. Some accessory electron
/archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00264.html (7,694 bytes)

24. Re: Topband: "Linear Loading" & 160-Meters (score: 1)
Author: k3ky@radioprism.com
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:31:29 -0700
Eddy I have seen better approaches to this in the literature. BTW I think that linear loading is considered very marginal at lengths 50 percent or less than normal resonant lengths. What has been do
/archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00192.html (11,153 bytes)

25. Re: Topband: contesting in a field (score: 1)
Author: <k3ky@radioprism.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:15:04 -0700
I like resonant, voltage-fed verticals for their simplicity. For field ops, they can be a very quick way to deploy a working antenna. On 40 meters, for example, you're only dealing with 70ft- or 35ft
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00117.html (9,311 bytes)

26. Re: Topband: Counterpoise very interresting (score: 1)
Author: <k3ky@radioprism.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 06:45:40 -0700
Cebik mentions Woodrow Smith in connection with a 1948 antenna book. I don't know if this is the same 'Woody Smith', W6BCX, but I suspect it is. Woody Smith wrote an article in March 1948 CQ Magazine
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00196.html (8,897 bytes)

27. Re: Topband: Counterpoise very interesting (score: 1)
Author: <k3ky@radioprism.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 18:40:08 -0700
In retrospect, I'm asking myself "was this thread a troll?" I can't tell who the sender is- no call, signature, etc. Could this be bashing calling the FCP a 'counterpoise'? Well, regardless, it's not
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00213.html (7,354 bytes)

28. Topband: K2AV Folded Counterpoise- More Transformer Questions (score: 1)
Author: <k3ky@radioprism.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 23:09:36 -0700
I echo W1FMR's question regarding possibly substituting a T200-2 core. Personally, I'd double it up, i.e. either a stack of two T-200-2 or else a T200A-2 which is 1.00 inch thick vs. 0.55 in. for a T
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00199.html (8,506 bytes)

29. Re: Topband: 4 new radials... (score: 1)
Author: <k3ky@radioprism.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:49:12 -0700
Hi, Jim Remember, when you transmit, those radials are radiating. Worst case, you might even get arcing from any unlucky voltage points along the 'radials' depending on power level and the actual len
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00085.html (7,263 bytes)

30. Re: Topband: Vertical dipoles in the real world (score: 1)
Author: <k3ky@radioprism.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 23:36:05 -0700
http://www.qrpdx.com/ant.html I think these are a great idea for simple, inexpensive directivity. I'd like to throw in the idea of trying this with a Moxon beam. As a horizontal antenna, there is no
/archives//html/Topband/2012-09/msg00215.html (9,094 bytes)

31. Re: Topband: K6STI low noise receive loop (score: 1)
Author: <k3ky@radioprism.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 16:48:35 -0700
(Quote) Hardy and others - thank you MUCHO Beaucoup! All replies were filled with sound suggestions or anecdotal evidence that have helped me put together a trade study that is leading me to.....erec
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00175.html (13,834 bytes)

32. Topband: Low Power TX radio 1980 (score: 1)
Author: <k3ky@radioprism.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 15:17:15 -0700
My best guess, based on what little information you have given here, is that the radio contains a *Seiler* Oscillator. I've not run across any reference to a "Sillner" oscillator prior to yours. The
/archives//html/Topband/2015-07/msg00004.html (7,239 bytes)

33. Topband: Ground Screen Question (score: 1)
Author: <k3ky@radioprism.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 07:47:50 -0700
Hi, Bob I wouldn't risk this, personally, for the small benefit that might be gained. Consider- if your tower ever takes a direct lightning hit, nearby ground currents can be very high indeed. There
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00181.html (8,054 bytes)

34. Topband: RE; Ground screen Question (score: 1)
Author: <k3ky@radioprism.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 12:29:37 -0700
No confusion at all, Jim. I know the difference between the two. His reinforcing steel inside his driveway is probably way far out of the realm of Ufer grounds, due to it being small gage conductors.
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00189.html (8,755 bytes)

35. Re: Topband: Topband Re: Ground Screen Question (score: 1)
Author: <k3ky@radioprism.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 11:52:52 -0700
Hi, Bob I'm really seeing two or more issues here. There has been some debate as to whether or not tying in a ground screen to elevated radials is a good thing or a bad thing. I'll leave that discuss
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00210.html (11,219 bytes)

36. Topband: lightning grounds for elevated radial antennas (score: 1)
Author: <k3ky@radioprism.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:25:54 -0700
Hi, Grant Seems like everyone is preoccupied with K5P and the deterioration of 160m DXCC standards, etc. Hi! Here's what I have picked up over the years. My comments address lightning mitigation only
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00378.html (10,821 bytes)

37. Topband: OT - US Hams, WWV closure (score: 1)
Author: <k3ky@radioprism.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2018 18:23:48 -0700
Oooh- here's the deal with that- Although I totally agree with the intent of the petition, and would otherwise add my name to it, I have several problems with this: Please note, I DO NOT intend to st
/archives//html/Topband/2018-08/msg00092.html (8,244 bytes)

38. Re: Topband: OT - US Hams, WWV closure (score: 1)
Author: <k3ky@radioprism.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 21:35:39 -0700
That's a great suggestion, Paul. Very constructive. Assuming such a transfer from the federal government could be implemented, funding would be needed. So if the worst happens and these stations do i
/archives//html/Topband/2018-08/msg00133.html (10,883 bytes)

39. Re: Topband: Recommended Relays (score: 1)
Author: <k3ky@radioprism.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2018 01:53:53 -0700
Hi, All Looking back at some of the better construction articles I've saved in recent years, this one stands out: "The StationPro Master Station Controller" by W8ZR in QST, August 2010, page 30-34. H
/archives//html/Topband/2018-12/msg00073.html (7,347 bytes)

40. Re: Topband: Modern Grand Solar Minimum from 2020 to 2055? (score: 1)
Author: <k3ky@radioprism.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 18:23:34 -0700
A grand solar minimum would be so disastrous for upper HF. Although I'd very much enjoy working Asians on 12 and 10 meters again, it now appears that may be less likely. OTOH it would be of some bene
/archives//html/Topband/2019-06/msg00032.html (7,740 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu