Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k3hx@juno.com: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Capacity Hat (score: 1)
Author: k3hx@juno.com (tttt ccccc)
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 02:29:05 -0500
I currently have a 42' radiator with a 66' "T" wire running essentially N-S. According the the version of the ON4UN book I have, adding another wire (in my case, E-W) will increase capacity but not d
/archives//html/Topband/2003-01/msg00171.html (6,625 bytes)

2. Topband: Power line noise on 160 (score: 1)
Author: k3hx@juno.com (tttt ccccc)
Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 22:43:21 +0100
I am now in my second year of trying to get the local power company to make it somewhat less noisy here. May offer the following suggestions: Once your patience has terminated, enlist the aid of the
/archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00138.html (7,272 bytes)

3. Topband: Increased range for Heath SB-1000 (score: 1)
Author: k3hx@juno.com (tttt ccccc)
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 01:04:01 -0400
Advice sought on increasing the 160 meter tuning range of the Heath SB-1000 amplifier. This amplifier will only be used on 160. 73 Tim K3HX -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/topband Submis
/archives//html/Topband/2001-07/msg00059.html (6,908 bytes)

4. Topband: 160 meter ampllifiers (score: 1)
Author: k3hx@juno.com (tttt ccccc)
Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 19:11:21 -0400
Looking for advice on a legal limit amp for 160. Will be at Dayton and would like words of wisdom on which older amps work well. This amp will be only used on 160. Thanks in advance. Tim K3HX -- FAQ
/archives//html/Topband/2001-05/msg00028.html (6,556 bytes)

5. Topband: KD9SV variable gain FET preamp circa 1989 (score: 1)
Author: k3hx@juno.com (t colbert)
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 21:05:00 +0000
I've unearthed an unbuilt kit to construct a tuned in, tuned out @27dB preamp kit using a 3SK88. It has been buried since 1989. I'd be grateful for any words of advice from those who have or are usin
/archives//html/Topband/2001-03/msg00047.html (6,791 bytes)

6. Topband: High pass RX filter (score: 1)
Author: k3hx@juno.com (t colbert)
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 12:40:13 +0000
Has anyone used the filter described in the ARRL Publishing Company's Antenna Handbook? If so, how well does it work? Modifications? Things to watch out for? 73 Tim K3HX -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.con
/archives//html/Topband/2000-12/msg00173.html (6,511 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Ground Radials (score: 1)
Author: tttt ccccc <k3hx@juno.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 14:55:44 -0500
OM, Here is how I solved the problem. I went to a thrift store and got a working electric lawn edger. I used it to cut slots in the sod about an inch deep. Poked the wire into the slots. The slots "h
/archives//html/Topband/2003-11/msg00094.html (10,398 bytes)

8. Topband: CQWW QRS? (score: 1)
Author: tttt ccccc <k3hx@juno.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 23:26:20 -0500
As a casual contestor, I've wondered why some stations clip right along at 40+ WPM, calling 10 or more times before an answer. I can copy 25 WPM but not what sounds like BRRRRRRP. Is there a strategy
/archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00011.html (7,011 bytes)

9. Topband: Stew Perry (score: 1)
Author: tttt ccccc <k3hx@juno.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 00:35:07 -0500
I noted very few stations in the "DX Window." Also noted few stations using the 40 wpm "burp-CQ" technique. Thanks to all the stations that picked me out of the static and were kind enough to come ba
/archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00254.html (6,875 bytes)

10. Topband: Contest CW Speeds (score: 1)
Author: "k3hx@juno.com" <k3hx@juno.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 19:11:03 GMT
As a casual participant in CW contests, it has long bewildered me why folk send CQ TEST at 40+ WPM in an attempt to get someone to come back. I can't copy 40 WPM. If the signal is strong and there is
/archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00220.html (6,903 bytes)

11. Topband: Grounding, Cadweld One-Shot source (score: 1)
Author: "k3hx@juno.com" <k3hx@juno.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 18:19:38 GMT
I'm improving the grounding at my station and need a source for Cadweld One-Shot devices. I've cleaned out RF Connections of the ones I can use. I will be using 5/8" x 8' copper-clad rods. Also, has
/archives//html/Topband/2006-04/msg00056.html (7,287 bytes)

12. Topband: QST Jun 06 RX Loop (score: 1)
Author: "k3hx@juno.com" <k3hx@juno.com>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 17:49:19 GMT
The June, 2006 QST has an article about a 160m RX loop. Comments, advice welcome. 73, Tim K3HX ________________________________________________________________________ Try Juno Platinum for Free! The
/archives//html/Topband/2006-05/msg00005.html (6,504 bytes)

13. Topband: Inverted "L" Radiation Resistance vs vertical height (score: 1)
Author: "k3hx@juno.com" <k3hx@juno.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 02:04:35 GMT
I'm trying to determine if it makes sense to raise the vertical portion of my 160 meter inverted "L" from 50 to 60 feet. The additional 10 feet of vertical length will require a considerable amount o
/archives//html/Topband/2006-09/msg00025.html (7,368 bytes)

14. Topband: 33', 50', 60' inverted "L" comparison assistance request (score: 1)
Author: "k3hx@juno.com" <k3hx@juno.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 01:47:50 GMT
Dear Topbanders, In preparation for the upcoming 160 meter contest, I'm trying to decide if it is worth the effort to increase the support height of the vertical portion of an inverted "L". My ground
/archives//html/Topband/2006-11/msg00156.html (8,021 bytes)

15. Topband: Stew Perry Thank-you (score: 1)
Author: "k3hx@juno.com" <k3hx@juno.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 21:22:35 GMT
Thanks to all the good folk who slowed down when they came back to me so I could more easily copy the grid report. Had a great time! Conditions here in Western PA quieter than I've heard in weeks. Pe
/archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00373.html (7,332 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu